My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
17000
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523467
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:01:10 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 4:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523467
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0007060
FACILITY_NAME
WINE GROUP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
17000
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24506030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17000 E HWY 120
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Paul Franzia - 2 - 20 April 2006 <br /> 4. Section 2 describes sampling of off-site water wells within a one-mile radius of the site. <br /> The usefulness of the data to be collected is questionable because of the likelihood that <br /> the off-site wells are screened in a deeper zone. For example, the on-site wells at the <br /> facility have TDS concentrations that range from 180 to 240 mg/L, but the monitoring <br /> wells have TDS concentrations in the range 410 to 1,400 mg/L. <br /> 5. The last paragraph in Section 2.1 implies that the proposed sampling locations described <br /> in Section 2.3 might change based on information gathered from publications and site <br /> reconnaissance. Please inform staff of any changes in proposed drilling locations prior to <br /> performing fieldwork. <br /> 6. Section 2.3.1 does not address CPT-5; please describe if the test will be performed as <br /> part of initial work or on an as-needed basis. <br /> 7. Section 2.3.3 discusses CPT-15 as an onsite location. Figure 10 shows CPT-15 as <br /> located to the west of the facility. Please clarify the test location. <br /> 8. The CPT discussion is not adequate for a reader to determine the scope of the <br /> investigation. There is no discussion of the following items: <br /> a. What traces will be recorded. <br /> b. What the target sample collection depth interval is. <br /> c. How samples will be collected, sample containers, preservatives, etc. <br /> d. How the CPT holes will be grouted. <br /> e. A discussion of the need for permits issued by the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD). <br /> 9. Section 2.2 states that a hydrogeological conceptual model will be developed. Please <br /> review the attached guidance on development of numerical models and use as <br /> appropriate. <br /> Please address each of the items listed above prior to implementing the Workplan, if you have <br /> any questions on this information, or would like to schedule a meeting to discuss the issues <br /> identified in this letter, please telephone me at (916) 464-4616. <br /> TIMOTH R. O'BRIEN <br /> Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br /> Enc: Guidelines for Development of Numerical Models <br /> cc: Margaret Lagorio, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, Stockton <br /> Robert Chrobak, P.E., Kennedy Jenks Consultants, San Francisco <br /> W\St&nObnenTTSen Joaquin) amel Ten Escalon Wnery\Frsmja 14 Apr Mdoc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.