My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524190
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2020 2:10:20 PM
Creation date
4/3/2020 1:50:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0524190
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0016241
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON REGIONAL WATER CONTROL FAC
STREET_NUMBER
2500
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16333003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2500 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS -10- <br /> CITY OF STOCKTON <br /> REGIONAL WASTEWATER CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LATE REVISIONS <br /> additional studies of these constituents are warranted. The Monitoring and Reporting <br /> Program (MRP) No. R5-2002-_specifies monitoring for these pollutants. Based on <br /> the results of monitoring, this Order maybe reopened for addition of appropriate effluent <br /> limitatioi,s :or these pollutants. <br /> Dioxin/Furans and PCBs <br /> 29. There are insufficient monitoring data for dioxin/furans and PCBs at this time to <br /> determine if there is a reasonable potential for the discharge to cause, or contribute to an <br /> in-stream excursion above a narrative or numerical water quality standard for these <br /> pollutants. This Order includes a provision to require monitoring and evaluation of these <br /> pollutants for a designated amount of time. Upon completion of the monitoring the Order <br /> may be reopened for addition of effluent limitations for these pollutants. <br /> Mercury and GroUA A Pesticides <br /> 30. The Delta waterways are 303(d) listed as impaired for mercury and Group A organo- <br /> chlorine pesticides (Group A pesticides) based on bioaccumulation of these pollutants in <br /> fish tissue. The CTR contains criteria for mercury and Group A pesticides, however, <br /> those criteria do not address bioaccumulation in the river(Fact Sheet, 11.1). The RWCF <br /> effluent contains concentrations of mercury and Group A pesticides below CTR priority <br /> pollutant criteria, however, since the CTR criteria are not based on bioaccumulation, the <br /> discharge was evaluated based on the Basin Plan's narrative toxicity objective. <br /> Furthermore, the Basin Plan requires that Group A Pesticides not be present in the water <br /> column in detectable concentrations. Any loading of those pollutants from the discharge <br /> may have the reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an excursion above the <br /> narrative toxicity objective by causing bioaccumulation in fish tissue. As discussed <br /> further in the Fact Sheet, health advisories by the Department of Health Services remain <br /> in effect for human consumption of fish in the Delta, including the SJR at Stockton, due <br /> to excessive concentrations of mercury and G_,..,. ^ Pestioia in fish flesh. These <br /> current warnings and available fish tissue data confirm that there is currently no <br /> assimilative capacity for these pollutants. Therefore, water quality based effluent <br /> limitations for mercury, and Group A pesticides that properly address bioaccumulation <br /> and the non-detect Basin Plan objective are required. The TMDL for mercury is <br /> scheduled to be completed by December 2005. For situations like this, the SIP <br /> recommends that limiting mass loading of the bioaccumulative pollutant should be <br /> considered in the interim at representative, current levels pending development of the <br /> TMDL. For Group A Pesticides, the Basin Plan non-detect objective becomes the final <br /> effluent limitation. <br /> This Order also requires the Discharger to construct Title 22 tertiary treatment, or <br /> equivalent. facilities for pathogen removal by 1 May 2006. These facilities will provide <br /> improve, i 1s removal, and ther_:ore are likely to significantly reduce existing mercury <br /> and Gro. :;sticides muss u8 in the discharge. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.