Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 9.0 REMEDIAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS <br /> This section provides practical information to be used in the conceptual design of the Central <br /> Area wellfield, including well locations, discharge and injection rates, and recommendations for <br /> screened intervals. ICE well effluent concentration data is also provided for use in the design <br /> of the Central Area water treatment system. Construction design specifications (e.g. well <br /> materials, discharge piping locations, etc.) and injection well design specifications are not <br /> provided in this document. <br /> The proposed Central Area well-field design is based on the Optimal Design Scenario presented <br /> in Section 8.4.5. Minor adjustments to extraction/injection rates and/or additional wells may <br /> be required based on the results of model sensitivity analyses and operating experience. <br /> 9.1 Well Locations <br /> Figure 9-1 shows the locations of 11 proposed Central Area extraction wells and nine injection <br /> wells. Model results indicate the injection of treated water will require two additional wells in <br /> the North Balloon Area in order to maintain adequate capture and optimal removal efficiency. <br /> These wells are also identified on Figure 9-1. If injection of treated water is not included in the <br /> final design, these additional North Balloon wells will not be necessary. The proposed Central <br /> Area extraction well design will function without injection of treated water. Model results show <br /> that the injection of treated water does not adversely affect plume containment or substantially <br /> increase the rate of ICE removal from the Central Area. <br /> The proposed locations of extraction wells in Figure 9-1 correspond to locations of existing <br /> monitoring wells (with the exception of well CB-1), and will be completed as new installations <br /> with a unique well name (extraction well names are not proposed in this document). Model <br /> results suggest that existing monitoring wells are well positioned to allow containment and <br /> efficient removal of ICE. The designation of existing well locations as extraction well locations <br /> • allows flexibility in extraction well design. New extraction wells may be installed immediately <br /> adjacent to existing well locations, and existing monitor wells may be used as "back-up" wells <br /> in the event of extraction well failure or other design modifications. Model results suggest that <br /> removal efficiency and containment are nearly identical regardless of whether new or existing <br /> — monitoring wells are used (increased pumping rates of new extraction wells due to increased well <br /> efficiency and full penetration provides no significant improvement in TCE removal efficiency <br /> or containment). <br /> The two new extraction wells located at well cluster 453 and at well 460-AB may be completed <br /> as single extraction wells which are screened across the transmissive portions of the A and B <br /> zones. Combining well 453-A and 453-B into a single extraction well explains the apparent <br /> discrepancy between the number of wells simulated in the Optimal Design Scenario (12) and the <br /> number proposed in this design (11)). Well 460-AB is located in an area where a discernible <br /> aquitard is not present between the A- and B-zones; therefore, the separate screening of the A- <br /> and B-intervals at this location is academic. Any significant aquitards encountered during the <br /> . � O � 9 - 1 <br />