Laserfiche WebLink
• FINDINGS <br /> PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PARAMETERS of SAMPLED GROUNDWATER <br /> Attached sampling data sheets by Del Tech reflect in field measurements from MW <br /> Nos 1 through 6 Laboratory Analysis Reports from Sequoia Analytical are <br /> summarized, with the most recent results (June 26, 2004)attached Reference <br /> ATTACHMENT 3, ANALYTICAL LABORATORY FINDINGS <br /> PHYSICAL PARAMETERS <br /> The WOS site is within the area represented by existing Monitoring Wells <br /> associated with the ongoing Victor Fine Foods Property project2 (Victor) Attention <br /> is directed reference the Victor Fine Foods Monitoring Well Field Parameter <br /> Information for the March 1, 2002 samplings, extracted from CVRWQCB records <br /> and attached in the previous WOS interim report by this report's author <br /> Within the immediate site area, ground water surface gradient information has <br /> been supplemented with depth to water findings taken from the newly installed <br /> monitoring wells The information is included in ATTACHMENT 5, <br /> GROUNDWATER GRADIENT and BEARING CALCULATION When measured <br /> in late June, the gradient of the groundwater surface is about 0 002 FT/FT to the <br /> northeast Since December 2000 to March 2004 the underlying shallow water <br /> surface dropped about 4 5 FT and there has been a shift in direction of flow to the <br /> East of several degrees Findings would be expected to vary dependent upon <br /> season Significant field irrigation pumping appears to be no closer than 600 FT <br /> f to the NE and as the surrounding shallow water is thought to be contaminated <br /> with brine (Reference Victor Fine Foods on going study and on site MW Nos 1 -6 <br /> electro conductivity readings) there is a strong likelihood that irrigation water in the <br /> recent years is extracted from deeper zones <br /> Concurrently with the November 2003 Cone Penetration Testing and the <br /> tDecember 2003 Quarterly Monitoring Well Testing the agricultural well located <br /> about 105 FT east of MW 6 was sampled at the direction of San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Departments representative The well, of unknown <br /> construction, did not yield any hydrocarbons As past results had been <br /> confounded, two separate laboratories were utilized <br /> TOC elevations referenced for depth to water and assumed elevations below <br /> ground surface (bgs ) were adjusted to a common datum used by the Victor Fine <br /> Foods study The datum was assumed valid and applied to the study by Barber <br /> for direct correlation between studied elevations <br /> 1 <br /> 2 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No 5-01-057 <br /> 2 <br />