Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> . 1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Upgradient Environmental Consultants (Upgradient) assumed the responsibility for assessment and <br /> monitoring of groundwater contamination at the Dallies Trucking facility in Stockton, California in <br /> September, 1994 The assessment was completed in late 1996, and Upgradient submitted a Problem <br /> Assessment Report in November of that year In the first quarter of 1997, Mr Steve Sasson of the <br /> San Joaquin County Department of Environmental Health approved the PAR and recommended <br /> that a Corrective Action Plan be prepared Although he assumed that groundwater monitoring <br /> would continue on a quarterly basis,he did not specifically request it in his letter <br /> Due to this misunderstanding, Gillies Trucking did not authorize Upgradient to continue <br /> groundwater monitoring or prepare a Corrective Action Plan until contacted by Mr Sasson in late <br /> October of 1997 The purpose of this report is to present the results of the 4th quarter monitoring, <br /> which took place on November 21 <br /> 2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION <br /> The project site is located at 3931 Newton Road, in an industrial area on the northeast outskirts of <br /> Stockton near U S Highway 99 The location of the site is shown in Figure 1, and the site facilities <br /> are shown in Figure 2. Originally agricultural property, the site was developed as a commercial <br /> truck terminal in 1973 The property occupies an area of about 3 5 acres <br /> • Topography in the area is generally flat, although the project site is elevated several feet above the <br /> adjacent parcels There is a maintenance building and office fronting Newton Road, with a large, <br /> unpaved storage yard/parking lot in the rear A diesel and gasoline fueling facility, consisting of two <br /> underground storage tanks (UST's), was formerly present on the east side of the storage yard <br /> (Figure 2) This facility was removed in 1989 and replaced with an above-ground fueling facility, <br /> which is located to the west of the abandoned facility <br /> 3.0 MONITORING PROCEDURES <br /> Upon arrival at the site, Upgradient personnel opened all six wells and allowed well pressures to <br /> equalize with atmospheric pressure before measuring water depths The depth to groundwater in <br /> each well was measured with a Solinst water level meter and the measurements were recorded on <br /> the Well Monitor Report (Appendix A) A Grundfos Readi-flo 2 groundwater pump was then used <br /> to purge 8 gallons from well GT-6 and 7 gallons from GT-9 During purging, pH, temperature, and <br /> conductivity were measured at 2-gallon intervals, and purging was discontinued when these <br /> parameters stabilized Because the top of the screened interval in wells GT-1, 2, and 3 was <br /> approximately 12 feet below the static water level, Mr Sasson requested Upgradient to purge <br /> between 20 and 25 gallons from these wells in an attempt to reach formation water beyond the well <br /> bore The pump was decontaminated with TSP solution between wells Because of slow recharge <br /> and binding of the pump against the well casing, GT-5 was hand-bailed with a disposable bailer, <br /> 2 <br />