Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' 1• INTRODUCTION <br /> • <br />' Former Exxon Retail Site (RS) 7-3942 is a vacant lot located at 4444 North Pershing Avenue in <br /> Stockton, California, on the southeast corner of the intersection of North Pershing Avenue and <br />' Rosemarie Lane (Figure 1) Used oil and three grades of gasoline were stored in four underground <br /> storage tanks, which were removed in July 1986 <br />' A Shell service station and a 7-11 food and gasoline service store are located on the southwest and <br /> northwest corners, respectively, of the intersection of North Pershing Avenue and Rosemarie Lane <br /> Previous laboratory analyses have consistently detected Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline <br />' (TPH-g), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), and methyl t-butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) in groundwater samples collected from MW8 and MW9, which are located adjacent to the <br /> Shell site and the 7-11 site, upgradient and crossgradient of former Exxon RS 7-3942 <br />' A nsk assessment work plan for the site was submitted to San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services in October 2000 The proposed work was performed in December 2000 The Request for <br />' No Further Remedial Action report was submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board in October 2001 <br />' 2. GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br />' On 20 September 2001, groundwater monitoring wells MWI-MW 13, UVB-MW1, and UVB-MW2, <br /> groundwater recovery wells RW 1, RW2, and RW4, soil vapor extraction wells V1-V4, and infection <br /> well IW1 were gauged Groundwater samples were collected from wells MW4, MW5, MW11, <br />' WB-MWI, UVB-MW2, RW2, RW4, V1-V3, and IW1 Figure 1 shows the locations of former site <br /> facilities and the locations of all ExxonMobil wells on and off the site The locations of offsite <br /> monitoring wells MW8, MW9, MW11, and MW13 are shown in Figure 2 Well MWll was <br />' resampled on 8 November 2001 because the analytical results from the 20 September sampling event <br /> were inconsistent with historical data <br />' On 20 September 2001, wells were monitored for the presence of liquid-phase hydrocarbons (LPH) <br /> using an optical interface probe A thickness of 0 01 feet of LPH was measured in wells V4 and <br /> RW 1 LPH was not observed in any other well The depth to groundwater was gauged, and <br />' groundwater elevations were calculated The approximate groundwater flow direction on 20 <br /> September was to the northeast, with a gradient of approximately 0 004, which is consistent with <br /> previous groundwater monitoring data for the site Current groundwater elevations are presented <br />' in boldface type in Table 1, along with previous data, and are shown in Figure 1 Copies of the field <br /> documents are included as Appendix A <br />' After the depths to water were measured, the wells were purged Approximately 3 well casing <br /> volumes of purge water were removed from each well Wells that dewatered during purging were <br /> allowed to recover prior to sampling After purging, groundwater samples were collected with <br />' factory-cleaned disposable bailers Groundwater samples were collected in 40-m1 glass VOA vials <br /> The vials were labeled and stored in an ice-filled cooler and transported under chain of custody The <br />' groundwater samples were submitted to SPL, Inc , in Houston, Texas, where they were analyzed for <br /> TPH-g by California EPA-modified EPA Method 8015, and for BTEX and MTBE by EPA Method <br /> 8021B Samples in which MTBE was detected were also analyzed for MTBE by EPA Method <br />' G 1Pr0l«[s%73912%I�STMW PIQa01 tie day 1 <br />