Laserfiche WebLink
feet (Figures 5 and b) Groundwater occurs at a depth of about 28-30 feet, an elevation of 20-22 <br /> feet below mean sea level, and flows northeast (Figure 7) at an average gradient of 0 008, about <br /> 40 feet per mile <br /> Groundwater occurs in the lenses of silty-to-coarse-grained sand extending from approximately <br /> 30 to 40 feet below ground surface, the sands are underlain by silty/clayey sediments to the <br /> explored depth of 50 feet <br /> Groundwater elevations in the investigated area have continued to drop P (more than three feet <br />' since December 1989) as a result of the drought of the past four years The results of well <br /> gauging are presented in Table 1 <br /> The values of transmissivity for the aquifer estimated from bailing, pumping, and injection tests <br /> conducted at the site range from 140 to 400 ft2/day The average transmissivity is about 200 <br /> fO/day (determined from pumping and injection tests) and is equivalent to a hydraulic conductiv- <br /> ity of about 10 ft/day (3 05 m/day) This is characteristic of silty sands (Freeze and Cherry <br /> 1979) <br /> tThe highest expected velocity is calculated with Darcy's equation <br /> V = KI/n <br /> where <br />' K= hydraulic conductivity (10 ft/day) <br /> I = average hydraulic gradient under the site (0.008) <br /> n = effective porosity of the aquifer (0 2 for silty sand) <br /> MUsing these values, the velocity (V) of groundwater flowing beneath former RS 7-3942 is esti- <br /> mated to be 0 4 ft/day, about 150 ft/year. <br /> Based on pumping test data, each of the recovery wells can be pumped continuous) at a rate of <br /> P P g rY P P Y <br /> about 3 gpm, creating about 10 feet of drawdown in each well These rates of pumping and <br /> drawdown should result in the water table dropping 5-8 feet in the area between wells with a <br /> capture zone extending about 150 feet off the site in a downgradient direction (Figure 8) Treat- <br /> ed groundwater can be reinjected upgradient into three injection wells, interrupting the effective <br /> radius of influence in this area and preventing any upgradient plume from infiltrating further <br /> toward the site The injection of 5 gpm into each of these wells (IW1, MW4, MW7) located as <br />' shown in Figure 4, would create an estimated 4-foot high mound in groundwater between injec- <br /> tion wells <br /> r <br /> cWw-739I�a19Vm 3 <br />