Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
1.3 STATUS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN THE SOIL AND GROUND- <br /> WATER <br /> To date, 16 monitoring wells have been installed on the site and 7 off the site to investigate the <br /> presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soils and groundwater and their source(s) (Figure 4) <br /> Because of the drought over the past four years, only eight of the new onsite wells contained <br /> water and could be sampled in May 1991 Five offsite wells were also sampled None of the old <br /> wells (MW 1-MW7) could be sampled, because water levels were insufficient to obtain represen- <br /> tative samples Boring logs for the existing wells are provided in Appendix A <br />' Liquid-phase hydrocarbons (LPH) have been found in onsite wells RW3 and V4 The highest <br /> concentrations of dissolved hydrocarbons were measured in samples of groundwater from wells <br /> located in the northern part of the site (RW1, RW2, RW4, V1, and V3) and in the downgradient <br /> offsite well MW 10 <br />' Disregarding the saturation levels that would be expected from the presence of LPH, the highest <br /> hydrocarbon concentration found so far was in V4, at 200,000 gg/L of TPH, with 31,000 µg/L of <br /> benzene Hydrocarbon concentrations are also high farther upgradient--up to 57,000 µg/L of <br /> TPH in well MW8 This area may have a separate source of hydrocarbons and will require more <br /> independent investigation The function of the proposed hydraulic barrier is to limit the infiltra- <br /> tion of any hydrocarbons from the upgradient area (MW8) <br /> Judging from data collected during previous investigations (EA 1987a, 1987b, 1988a, 1988b, <br />' 1989a, 1989b, 1990, 1991), fuel may have been lost when groundwater was significantly lower <br /> than present levels A subsequent increase in the groundwater level may have trapped hydrocar- <br /> bons in the soil, this may be why initial investigations identified only localized concentrations of <br /> hydrocarbons in the soil above the water table Concentrations of TPH to 6,900 mg/kg were <br /> detected in samples from soils excavated from the tank pit, but no elevated concentrations of <br /> TPH were detected in soil samples collected in the unsaturated zone in the monitoring wells <br />' Entrapped hydrocarbons may dissolve in groundwater and disperse in the direction of ground- <br /> water flow. Investigations carred out as the water level has dropped have revealed that most of <br /> the petroleum hydrocarbons occur between 30 and 40 feet below the surface Part of the petrole- <br /> um hydrocarbons were released when the water table dropped below the top of the fuel-saturated <br /> soils, as observed previously in wells MW3 and MW6, and now in RW3, where recently as <br />' much as 0 5 feet of LPH was measured (Table 1) A similar situation is found upgradient of the <br /> site, where the highest concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil (3,200 mg/kg TPH) was <br /> found below the water table. Such a condition leads to petroleum hydrocarbons actively dissolv- <br /> ing in groundwater to the degree of saturation, which hinders both of the natural processes, <br /> biodegradation and evaporation, that usually act when petroleum hydrocarbons contact the <br /> atmosphere in the vadose zone. Remediation of the site will require- (a) capturing the dissolved <br /> hydrocarbon plume and depressing the water table by pumping groundwater, and (b) recovering <br />' -W-b6 7394Vjd91/M 4 <br />