Laserfiche WebLink
06 April 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 99-0592 <br /> IPage 2 of 4 <br /> addition, a water sample was collected from domestic well DW-1 after the well purge valve was <br /> opened and water was allowed to run until the pump turned on The samples were transferred into <br /> laboratory-supplied 40-mL EPA-approved volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5 mL <br /> 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative The sample containers were then labeled with the <br />' well designation, date, time and the sampler's initials The samples were transported in a chilled <br /> container under chain-of-custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a California <br /> Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified laboratory,for analysis The samples were analyzed <br /> for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> IMethod 8015M, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and methyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8021 or EPA Method 8260B, and <br /> • Fuel additives di-isopropyl ether DIPE ethyl tertiary-butyl ether ETBE , MTBE, tertiary <br /> amyl methyl ether(TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), methanol, ethanol, 1,2-dibromoethane <br /> (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 08 July 2003 and 12 December 2003 Laboratory analysis of ground water samples was used to <br /> Iquantify the impact to ground water <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION Y <br /> I <br /> On 08 July 2003, depth to ground water was measured between 62 90 feet and 64 92 feet below the <br /> I top of the well casings, ground water elevations at the site ranged from 35 11 feet below mean sea <br /> level(MSL) in MW-1 to 38 35 feet below MSL inwells MW-2 and MW-3 The groundwater flow <br /> was directed toward the southwest with a hydraulic gradient calculated at approximately 0 0008 <br /> Ifoot/foot <br /> On 12 December,depth to ground water was measured between 63 40 feet and 65 34 feet below the <br /> I top of the well casings, ground water elevations at the site ranged from 35 61 feet below MSL in <br /> well MW-1 to 38 69 feet below MSL in well MW-4 The ground water flow was directed toward the <br /> northeast with a hydraulic gradient calculated at approximately 0 0007 ft/ft <br />' Ground water elevation data from well MW-I was not used to determine the gradient for the July <br /> • or December monitoring events,this well is screened at a different interval than wells MW-2 through <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />