Laserfiche WebLink
SER)ACES <br /> PUBLICiIEALTHY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNT <br /> • <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Health Officer <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M.D., M.P.H., Acting 4CFko �' <br /> 445 N. San Joaquin Street ( 09 468-3420 <br /> 0Stockton, CA 95201-0388 <br /> 2 <br /> JT <br /> JAN QUIJANO <br /> TRI VALLEY GROWERS ASSOCIATION <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES <br /> P O BOX 1211 ?JUN 10 1994 <br /> MODESTO CA 95353 <br /> Re: Plant T: 26200 North Galt Road Site Code: 1920Site Code: 2040 <br /> Former Plant K: 11 South "A" Street <br /> A beneficial meeting was recently held on May 23, 1994 and was attended by yourself, <br /> Bob Bennett, and Chris Savage representing Tri Valley Growersa Bill Channell <br /> represented RESNA Industries. San Joaquin County Public Health Services, <br /> Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) was represented by Margaret Lagorio, Mary <br /> Meays, and Linda Turkatte. PHS/EHD has prepared the following meeting summary. <br /> Plant T: 26200 North Galt Road <br /> The meeting was requested by Tri-Valley to discuss budgeting next year's remediation <br />'i activities. The groundwater extraction system which is currently being operated was <br /> discussed. An estimate of pore volumes extracted was submitted for consideration of the <br /> effectiveness of the currently operating groundwater extraction system. A flow meter has <br /> recently been installed to estimate the amount of groundwater discharged. It was agreed <br /> that the residual soil contamination may be acting as a secondary source of <br /> contamination to groundwater and that groundwater extraction, as a sole remediation <br /> method, may be required for a very long period of time before cleanup goals would be <br /> reached. <br /> The residual soil contamination was further discussed and PHS/EHD requested <br /> additional soil investigation to define the extent of soil contamination. PHS/EHD stated <br /> that until the extent of soil contamination was determined it would be difficult to <br /> evaluate remedial alternatives. Tri-Valley indicated that the recommendation would be <br /> taken under consideration and would respond within 45 days. <br /> Tri-Valley also requested that they be allowed to obtain their own quarterly samples and <br /> perform routine maintenance of the groundwater extraction system. PHS/EHD indicated <br /> that maintenance of the system by Tri-Valley would pose no concerns; however, approval <br /> to obtain their own samples would be withheld at that time pending further discussion. <br /> Tri-Valley stated that Stanislaus and Merced Counties' allow Tri-Valley to collect their <br /> own samples. PHS/EHD indicated that their request would be taken under <br /> consideration. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />