My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
8200
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545621
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:59:15 PM
Creation date
4/28/2020 2:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545621
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003977
FACILITY_NAME
SPEEDY FOOD #2*
STREET_NUMBER
8200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8200 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
T f <br /> • �""� 44asibility Study—Enhancement of <br /> Existing Remediation Activities <br /> 8200 N. Highway 99, Stockton, CA <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> • GZA agrees with. EHD and the screen intervals will be modified to I0-foot lengths. <br /> • Mr. Price discussed the screen interval modifications with Ms. Duncan on September 20, <br /> 2007. <br /> Paragraph 5: Regarding MtBE mass estimates <br /> "...Please submit the calculation and data to SJC/EHD no later than August 10, 2007". <br /> • GZA submitted the information to EHD along with the Groundwater Monitoring Well <br /> Installation and Soil Boring Permit Application dated August 1, 2007. <br /> Paragraph 6: Regarding groundwater contamination near MW 12 <br /> "A feasibility study of remediation methods...was not provided". "..While While source area removal <br /> does need to be addressed, it does not seem likely it will enhance the remediation of the <br /> groundwater contamination remaining in and near MW12, which is some distance removed from <br /> the onsite source area". <br /> • The following Feasibility Study focuses on remediation methods to enhance the cleanup of <br /> groundwater near MW 12. <br /> • After the analysis of soil samples collected from the confirmation boring near MW 1 and <br /> SB2 has been reviewed, GZA will evaluate the need to enhance remediation near the former <br /> tank pit (source area). <br /> Paragraph 7: Regarding submittal of feasibility study <br /> "Please proceed with submittal of the now overdue feasibility study for enhancement of the <br /> remediation of remaining groundwater contamination. The study should compare at least two <br /> cleanup alternatives for both cost and potential remedial effectiveness". <br /> • The following Feasibility Study addresses two alternatives (additional groundwater <br /> extraction and in-situ chemical oxidation via ozone sparging) to enhance existing <br /> remediation activities at the site. <br /> Paragraph 8: Regarding well permit application <br /> "Please proceed with submittal of a San Joaquin County well permit application..." <br /> • GZA submitted the Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Soil Boring; Permit <br /> Application dated August 1, 2007. <br /> • The Well Permit Application was submitted on August 1, 2007. SJC issued the permit <br /> (SR# 51533) on August 6, 2007, <br /> 1.0 REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES TO DATE <br /> Remedial actions to date have included groundwater extraction and treatment to control of migration of <br /> dissolved contaminants in the source area and downgradient of monitoring well MW 12 as well as soil <br /> vapor extraction to address both vadose soil contamination and free product in the source area. <br /> As a result of both vapor extraction and groundwater extraction, the concentrations of dissolved <br /> contaminants in groundwater at the site have decreased substantially. However, significant levels still <br /> remain and the mass-removal rate is low. We propose to improve the current groundwater remediation <br /> G:IGROUNDZEITULEBURGIReparts10709 FS rem enhancement.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.