Laserfiche WebLink
' r <br />` GROUND ZERO ANALYSIS, INC. <br /> 1714 Main Street <br /> Escalon,California 95320-1927 Ece <br /> Telephone:(209)838-9$88FED Facsimile:(209)838-9883 <br /> Ay 61 <br /> ENVIR <br /> August 10, 2010 PER� 'EIV 7' <br /> Ml risER��CEs rH <br /> Ms. Lori Duncan <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Subject: Appendix A Addendum—Soil Sourced Vapor Intrusion <br /> Speedy Foods;8200-N. lfighway 99, Stockton,:CA <br /> Dear Ms. Duncan: <br /> Sections 15.0 and 16.1 of Ground.Zero's Appendix A Site Closure Request dated July 2, 2010, <br /> conclude that the chemicals of concern are not found in soil samples at concentrations that would <br /> pose a risk to human health or the environment. Published tables were used in the assessment of <br /> vapor intrusion from soil sourced contamination. The assessment was conservative and based on <br /> the environmental screening levels (ESLs) for residential land use (Table C-1) published in the San <br /> Francisco Bay RWQCB in the document Screening for Environmental Concerns at Sites with <br /> Contaminated Soil and Groundwater (revised May 2008). The published ESL tables include <br /> screening levels for the emission of subsurface vapors to building interiors. <br /> Ground Zero's Appendix A Site Closure Request did not assess the possibility of soil sourced vapor <br /> intrusion from the undeveloped area adjacent to the Speedy Food Mart. Soil samples were collected <br /> during the installation of monitoring wells: MW5, MW6, MW7, MWS, MW9B, MW10, MW11, <br /> MW12,MW15, MW16, EW2, and EW3 (off-pavement wells). These monitoring wells are located Y <br /> m the undeveloped area adjacent o theSpeedy Food Mart to the north, northeast, and east. With <br /> the exception of EW3 all soil samples were collected within or below the capillary :fringe. <br /> Laboratory analysis of all soil samples indicate that TPHg was not present above laboratory <br /> reporting limits suggesting the soil contamination was limited the area of the former underground <br /> storage tanks (USTs). MTBE was detected in MW6, MW 12, and EW2 in samples taken from <br /> within or below the capillary fringe. A soil sample was collected at 40 feet below grade surface <br /> (bgs) from EW3 with results indicating that there were no analyzed constituents above laboratory <br /> detection limits. <br />