My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005634
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
14800
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545626
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:50:30 PM
Creation date
4/29/2020 2:29:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005634
RECORD_ID
PR0545626
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000957
FACILITY_NAME
LATHROP GAS & FOOD MART*
STREET_NUMBER
14800
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
19702004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
14800 S HWY 99 RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Results of Confirmation Sod Boring,Domestic Well Sampling And Closure Request <br /> Moore Petroleum,Inc, 14800 West Frontage Road,Manteca,California <br /> Page 2 <br /> In early 1995, Emcon installed a soil vapor extraction system consisting of a Remediation Service, <br /> Int'l Spray Aeration Vapor Extraction (S A V E ) system at the subject site The vapor extraction <br /> system was installed per San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) <br /> permit conditions The vapor extraction system consisted of an internal combustion engine with <br /> catalytic converters mounted on the exhaust pipe To date, the vapor extraction system has <br /> extracted approximately 2,390 lbs of TPH, as gasoline, and 7 8 lbs of berizene <br /> On January 23, 1995, Emcon started a groundwater treatment system at the subject site The <br /> groundwater treatment system was pneumatically operated via compressed air supplied from the <br /> R S I unit and extracted groundwater from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 <br /> Once the groundwater arrived in the remediation compound via V diameter PVC piping, it was <br /> filtered through two in-line particulate filters and then through two in-line, 400 lb carbon vessels <br /> Upon discharging from the carbon vessels, it was re-injected through two re-injection wells, RW-1 <br /> and RW-2, located to the west of the remediation compound (Figure 2) To date, the water <br /> treatment system has extracted 18 pounds (lbs ) of TPH, as gasoline, and 0 37 lbs of benzene <br /> On November 27, 1996, Moore Petroleum received a letter from San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division (County) giving their approval to shut down the groundwater <br /> • treatment system and the vapor extraction system due to low system influent concentrations <br /> RESULTS OF CONFIRMATION SOIL BORING <br /> On August 29, 1997, Apex personnel supervised the drilling of four soil borings (VB-1 through <br /> VB-4) at the site (Figure 2) The purpose of the four soil borings was to verify the absence of <br /> TPH, as gasoline, TPH, as diesel, BTEX, 1,2-dichloroethane and MTBE The soil borings were <br /> drilled to a depth of 25 feet below ground surface (bgs) Soil samples were collected at various <br /> depths, and submitted under chain-of-custody (COC) documentation, to Sparger Technology, Inc <br /> (Sparger), a state-certified laboratory All samples were collected in accordance with the Apex <br /> Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) included in Appendix A The soil samples were analyzed <br /> for above-mentioned constituents by EPA Methods 8020, 8015, 601 and 8260, respectively <br /> A representative of the County was on site during the drilling and sampling of VB-1 through VB-4 <br /> The County representative and Apex personnel determined which soil samples be submitted for <br /> analyses Samples were chosen based on field screening, odor and proximity to the UST and <br /> product lines <br /> The laboratory analytical results indicate that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were below <br /> standard lab detection limits in all soil samples analyzed, except sample VB-2-25, which had 0 0017 <br /> ppm of 1,2-dichloroethane The soil sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1 Soil X <br /> boring logs are included in Figures 3 through 6 " 1 t 2--'�-V�A U <br /> • Soil samples VB-4-15 and VB-4-25 were not analyzed due to lab error Samples VB-4-I5 and <br /> JY D 1_PROJECTIE'STRA02 009\Results0997\ResultsReport doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.