My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003873
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
O
>
132 (HWY 132)
>
2393
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545635
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003873
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 1:10:18 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 1:01:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003873
RECORD_ID
PR0545635
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003586
FACILITY_NAME
VERNALIS ORCHARD FUEL
STREET_NUMBER
2393
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HWY 132
City
VERNALIS
Zip
95385
APN
25525007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2393 E HWY 132
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I A <br /> 26 April 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0520 <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br /> 4 6 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Water samples were collected from each well using a new disposable plastic bailer Each water <br /> sample was transferred into three 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% HCl as a sample <br /> preservative and Into one 1-liter amber bottle without preservative After collection, the samples <br /> were labeled and placed in a chilled container for transportation under chain-of-custody to <br /> IMcCampbell Analytical Laboratory(MAI) of Pacheco, California Each sample was analyzed for <br /> • TPH-g and TPH-d by EPA Method 8015 Modified and <br /> • BTEX and DIPE, ETBE, MTBE, TAME and TBA by EPA Method 8260 Modified <br /> 4 7 MONITORING WELL SURVEY <br /> tThe casing elevations of each well installed for the site for the UST investigation were surveyed <br /> relative to a bench mark at the southeastern sidewalk of the service building on the site <br /> 10 On 18 February 2000, a California state-licensed survey engineer from Baumbach & Piazza, Inc <br /> surveyed a reference point on the top of each ground water monitoring well at the site to the nearest <br /> 0 01-foot relative to the assumed bench mark at 100 feet above mean sea level (msl) The r"esults of <br /> the monitoring well survey are contained in Table 3 The surveying report (Baumbach& Piazza) is <br /> presented in Appendix C <br /> I <br /> 5.0 FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation and flow direction were calculated from field data, the hydrocarbon impact <br /> to ground water was assessed by laboratory analysis <br /> 1 <br /> 5 1 STRATIGRAPHY AND DEPTH TO GROUND WATER <br />' Overall, sand was the dominant soil type encountered at the site Silty clay was encountered in the <br /> samples collected from a depth of 5 feef bsg in all soil borings Sand was generally encountered in <br /> the samples collected at a depth of 10 feet bsg Coarse sand with gravel was encountered at 15 feet <br /> and typically at 20 feet bsg Clay with sand was encountered in the samples collected from a depth <br /> of 30 feet bsg to a depth of 45 feet bsg in boring SBI. <br /> Ground water was measured at a depth of 17 feet to 23 feet bsg Bonn los are Included in <br /> . rid p g g g <br /> Appendix A A stratigraphic cross section is depicted in Figure 3 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.