Laserfiche WebLink
' 29 August 2001 <br /> S AGE-NC Project No 96-0229 <br />' Page 4 of 5 <br />' deeper ground water conditions Deeper ground water in the area of MW-1 (48 to 53 feet <br /> bsg)is Impacted by TPH-g,BTEX, MTBE, deeper ground water in the area of downgradient <br /> well MW-IOB is impacted by MTBE <br />' • The dissolved TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE plume is at least 25 feet thick in the area of MW-1 <br /> (screened 48 to 53 feet bsg) and MW-2 (screened 25 to 45 feet bsg) <br />' • MTBE was detected in the sample collected from well MW-1 (screened 48 to 53 feet bsg) <br /> In deeper ground water, but was not detected in the samples collected from shallow water <br /> on-site wells MW-2 (located 5 feet from MW-1), MW-3 or MW-4, implying that an <br />' undelineated MTBE and possibly DIPE-Impact may be present crossgradient to <br /> downgradient of the site at deeper depths (Figure 5) <br />' • The greatest concentrations of off-site dissolved MTBE were detected in downgradient wells <br /> MW-6 at 910,ug/l, MW-7 at 630 ggll and MW-8 at 25 tgll and MW-10A at 34,ug/l <br /> • Increasing TPH-g, BTEX and MTBE were reported in water samples collected from wells <br />' MW-3 and MW-1 OA, increasing TPH-g was reported from MW-7 and increasing MTBE <br /> was reported from MW-6 and MW-10B, suggesting the plume has shifted towards the <br /> northeast <br /> The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br /> wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-6 indicate that these wells are within or near the <br />' dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon"core area" of the plume (Figure 4) <br /> Based on maps depicting the estimated extent of dissolved TPH-g (Figure 4), the horizontal <br /> extent of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume has not been defined north of MW-7 or northwest <br /> of MW-2, the vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water has not been delineated <br /> in any direction <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon data collected during June 2001, AGE recommends ' <br /> • Preparation of a feasibility study work plan to assess remedial alternatives for feasibility and <br /> .to aA_CSS +I,- d l—d petroleum. i,..,a...,..,,-t,o 1,,.,,e at+I,n �o <br /> VVJL LV a41\il\+JJ LllV 1JjV1YV peLl VlV lull lir LLr cu VVIl p1L11116+ "t Llll.. al LV <br /> • Preparation of a corrective action plan (CAP), the CAP should include results of any <br /> feasibility studies to determine appropriate remediation alternatives for the site <br /> • Performance of a receptor survey to locate potential receptors within 2,000 feet of the site, <br /> results of the receptor survey should be included in the CAP <br /> • Continued utilization of wells MW-1 through MW-10 for quarterly ground water monitoring <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />