Laserfiche WebLink
' 26 May 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0229 <br />' Page 4 of 6 <br />' wells MW-1, MW-9 and MW-14A at concentrations of 170 gg/1 , 14 µg/1 and 0 59 µg/l, <br /> respectively <br /> No other constituents of concern were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the analyzed <br /> samples Previous and current analytical results of ground water monitoring well samples are <br /> summarized in Tables 3 and 4 The laboratory reports (McCampbell Analytical Inc Work Order <br />' 0308418) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br />' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> On 24 March 2004,a state of California state-licensed survey engineer from Morrow Surveying Land <br /> ISurveyors (MSLS) surveyed the top of well casings from newly installed wells MW-13 through <br /> MW-19, and re-surveyed the top of well casings from wells MW-1 through MW-12 to the nearest <br /> 0 01-foot utilizing GPS techniques and relative to vertical datum point NAVD88 (North American <br /> IVertical Datum 1988) The results of the monitoring well survey are contained in Table 1 The <br /> original elevation survey for wells MW-1 through MW-12 was relative to vertical datum point <br /> NGVD29(National Geodic Vertical Datum 1929),which off-sets NAVD88 by approximately 2 feet <br /> The implications from the findings of the August 2003 ground water monitoring event are <br /> C Ground water flow direction at the site was inferred to be towards the northeast at an <br /> approximate gradient of 0 004 ft/ft, this appears to be the prevailing flow direction for the <br /> area(Figure 3),offsite and towards the northeast,ground water gradient appeared to be much <br /> steeper at an approximate gradient of 0 02 ft/ft <br /> Due to the low hydraulic gradient at the site, slight variations in ground water <br /> Irecharge/discharge could greatly modify the inferred ground water flow direction <br /> • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br /> wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-6 indicate that these wells are within or near the <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon"core area" of the plume (Figure 4) <br /> • TPH-g,BTEX and MTBE were reported for the ninth consecutive quarter in water samples <br /> i v11 lid J.1 1vi1TV-9, 3uggiStiil�that ilii,PIU111V vfpCtrvliruiii-1t11PaiJtCd SIvuiid waL%,i 111a'y <br /> have shifted eastward towards MW-9 (Table 3) <br /> • The highest concentrations of on-site dissolved MTBE were detected from deeper screened <br /> well MW-1 (screened 48 to 53 feet bsg), lesser on-site MTBE concentrations were detected <br /> from shallow screened wells MW-2 (screened between 25 and 45 feet bsg) and MW-3 <br /> (screened between 29%2 and 49%2 feet bsg (Figure 5) <br /> 1 <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />