My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543479
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 9:46:00 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 9:07:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0543479
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024679
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA'S CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
6230
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
081360030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6230 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Remedial Action Plan <br /> Canepa's Car Wash, 6230 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, California <br /> March 3, 2003 <br /> Page 4 <br /> The site groundwater gradient is to the northeast and the groundwater elevation contours from the January <br /> 2003 sampling event are shown in Figure 2. The average depth to groundwater measured was <br /> approximately 36 feet bgs, 20 feet higher than the groundwater depth in early 1993 , as shown in the site <br /> I hydrograph, Figure 3 . Figures 4 through 6 provide general geologic cross sections. Contaminant <br /> groundwater isoconcentation contours are provided in Figure 7. <br /> ? � In the Problem Assessment Report and Corrective Action Plan for Canepa's Car Wash (PAR/CAP) dated <br /> October 18, 2002, the mass of benzene calculated in the groundwater was approximately 6.7 gallons. <br /> i, 3.0 TREATMENT SYSTEM <br /> 3.1 STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS <br /> ` i The PAR/CAP evaluated the potential remedial design alternatives and concluded that pump and treat <br /> with soil vapor extraction was the technically-feasible, cost-effective remedial strategy. Pump and treat <br /> has an extensive history as a remediation strategy. The traditional concern with a pump and treat strategy <br /> is the difficulty in reaching site closure concentrations in a reasonable time frame and with reasonable <br /> total project cost. However, the significant rise in groundwater elevation, resulting in the saturation of <br /> previously contaminated vadose zone soil, indicates that some groundwater drawdown in conjunction <br /> with soil vapor extraction could significantly reduce site contaminants in addition to mitigating further <br /> rc down-gradient plume migration. <br /> -� 3.2 TREATMENT SYSTEM DESIGN <br /> The proposed treatment system is comprised of two extraction wells with submersible pumps, an air <br /> stripping unit, and a thermal oxidizer, in combination with the existing vapor extraction system. The <br /> 1 extraction wells are the two 44nch diameter wells on site: MW- 1 , screened from 50 to 70 feet below <br /> l ground surface (bgs), and MW- 11 , screened from 25 to 45 feet bgs. Underground piping will also be <br /> installed to MW-2, a 2- inch well screened from 50 to 70 feet bgs, as an optional extraction point. The <br /> treatment system location and conceptual design are shown in Figures 8 and 9, Appendix A. The design <br /> is intended to remove the air-borne contaminants through air stripping and treating both the air stripper <br /> exhaust and the vapor extraction exhaust in the thermal oxidizer. <br /> ; I The area in which the system will be located is restricted by width, so the treatment train will be <br /> assembled side by side. Although we are still soliciting equipment bids, the current design uses Sofleco <br /> equipment mounted on 4-foot by 6-foot skids. <br /> r The vapor extraction unit is a 300 ACFM Liquid Ring Blower. This is a very quiet blower minimizing the <br /> noise impact to the surrounding businesses and residences. The unit runs on 240 volts and has a <br /> maximum capability of 300 ACFM and up to 29 inches of mercury. The thermal oxidizer is also rated at <br /> 300 ACFM and will be fired by natural gas plumbed to the site, and includes a built-in differential <br /> pressure transmitter with pitot tube for flow measurement and a chart recorder. The air stripper includes a j <br /> 210 ACFM blower and six trays designed to handle flows from I to 40 gpm. Total flow is designed to be <br /> t less than 10 gpm. <br /> 3.3 PERMITTING AND MONITORING <br /> The system, as designed, will require a revision of the existing air discharge permit and a sanitary sewer <br /> permit. The system is expected to operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Discharge to the sanitary <br /> sewer of more than 10 gpm results in characterization as a major discharger with added requirements, so <br /> the discharge will be kept to below 10 gpm. As noted in the PAR/CAP, a pumping rate of 5 gpm is <br /> � � CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.