Laserfiche WebLink
Caoepa's Car Wash (Pacific Avenue) <br /> Problem Assessment Report and Corrective Action Plan <br /> Page 3 <br /> that could be impacted by migration of groundwater from the site . The sensitive receptor survey consisted <br /> of inquiries to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR), Central District in Sacramento, <br /> California; contacting public water purveyors ; visually inspecting the area; and interviewing residents <br /> located in the site vicinity. The results of the sensitive receptor survey follow. <br /> The "bier 1 Risk Based Corrective Action Evaluation was conducted using the software RBCA Tool Kit <br /> for Chemical Releases, Version 1 .3 . Based ort the well survey described below, groundwater ingestion <br /> was not considered a route of exposure. Consequently, the only routes of exposure considered were <br /> indoor and outdoor inhalation exposures. The results of the Tier 1 Risk Based Corrective Action <br /> Evaluation are in Section 6.2 below . <br /> 6. 1 SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY <br /> Well records were cross-referenced with Assessors Parcel Maps and city street maps. This process helped <br /> identify records that were estimated to be within the 2,000-foot radius . DWR records typically consist of <br /> owner' s name, well location map, address of well, and type of well. Documents provided by the DWR <br /> associated with Section, Township, and Range include information pertaining to 16 domestic water wells. <br /> A review of DWR records found that one record was illegible or incomplete and could not be identified <br /> with present day owners. Based on a review of Assessor Parcel Maps, area reconnaissance, and city street <br /> maps, 10 well records contained location data outside of the 2,000-foot radius. Five well records were <br /> verified that pertain to locations within the 2,000-foot radius (Figure 17). <br /> 6. 1 . 1 Wells Within 2,000 Feet <br /> According to DWR records correlated with present day APN and mapping information, five well records <br /> pertain to locations within 2,000 feet of the site. <br /> • Two wells were destroyed using pea gravel and cement according to the DWR records. <br /> • Two wells were identified by permission of the owner or resident during the site reconnaissance <br /> (529 Marengo Avenue, and 755 Porter Avenue, as described below) . Neither well was being used <br /> at the time of site reconnaissance. <br /> • One well was not located (see Gettysburg Place, below). <br /> • In addition interviews with local residents indicate that at least seven wells are located within the <br /> 2,000-foot search radius that are not documented by DWR records . <br /> 529 Marengo Avenue _ <br /> The well owner at 529 Marengo Avenue (WI ) had the original well installed in 1951 . He said that lie has <br /> been using public water since the mid- 1970s. He also indicated that at least four of his surrounding <br /> neighbors also had wells. He indicated that his well is not currently operational due to a faulty electric <br /> pump . The pump is still in the well; thus, the well was inaccessible for grab sampling. <br /> 755 Porter Avenue <br /> The resident at 755 Porter Avenue (W2) allowed us to look for the well, which was located in an <br /> outbuilding in back of the residence. According to the resident, they were not using it for potable water or <br /> irrigation ; they are using public wafer. This well was installed in 1951 . The resident at 743 Porter Avenue <br /> indicated that the well was used for irrigation of an orchard area behind the 755 residence until <br /> approximately 1988 . <br /> �s <br /> $. 1� CONDOR <br />