Laserfiche WebLink
Canepa's Car Wash <br /> 6230 Pacific Avenue,Stockton,CA <br /> Second Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report,May 2004 <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> . GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND GRADIENT <br /> Groundwater elevation contours estimated for the shallow monitor wells (MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, <br /> MW-6, MW-7, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-11) on May 7, 2004 indicate that the groundwater gradient is to <br /> the northeast and is generally consistent with previously estimated groundwater gradients (Figure 2, <br /> attached). Monitor well MW-12D was not used in groundwater elevation contouring due to the well's <br /> deep screen interval. An estimated groundwater gradient of 0.0045 ft/ft towards the northeast was <br /> measured using water level data from monitor wells MW-6 and MW-5. The average depth to groundwater <br /> measured in the shallow monitor wells for this event decreased (increase in water table elevation) by <br /> approximately 0.28 feet since January 30, 2004. A hydrograph of historic groundwater elevations is <br /> attached as Figure 3. 1t should be noted that the top of the well screens for shallow monitor wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-7 were below the water table, consistent with much of the monitoring history at the site. <br /> Table 2 <br /> Groundwater Elevation Data (May 7, 2004) <br /> Well Casing Well Collar Depth to Groundwater <br /> Screen <br /> WELL Elevation Water .Elevation <br /> Interval feet-b s (feet) (feet) (feet) <br /> MW-1 50-70 15.48 37.72 -22.24 <br /> MW-2 50-70 15.29 37.32 -22.03 <br /> MW-3 50-70 15.53 38.20 -22.67 <br /> MW4 50-70 15.83 38.46 -22.63 <br /> MW-5 50-70 14.71 37.54 -22.83 <br /> MW-6 45-65 14.89 36.66 -21.77 <br /> MW-7 45-65 15.80 37.69 -21.89 <br /> MW-9 25-45 14.84 37.66 -22.82 <br /> MW-10 25-45 14.72 36.72 -22.00 <br /> MW-11 25-45 15.12 37.07 -21.95 <br /> MW-12D 100-110 14.99 37.03 -22.04 <br /> LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the monitor wells and SV-4 were analyzed for TPH-G by <br /> Method 8015M and benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) and selected gasoline <br /> oxygenates/additives by EPA Method 8260B by Excelchem Environmental Labs of Roseville, California <br /> (Excelchem). The selected oxygenates/additives included methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), ethanol, <br /> tertiary-butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (D1PE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE), ter -amyl methyl ether <br /> (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB). <br /> The current groundwater sample analytical results (see Table 3) are generally consistent with the <br /> historical results (Table A, Attachment Q. None of the contaminants of concern were detected at or <br /> above the laboratory reported detection limits in monitor wells MW-9 and MW-12D. Monitor well MW- <br /> 12D has generally shown a decrease in contaminant concentrations each quarter since monitoring of the <br /> deep aquifer began in October of 2001. <br /> Contaminant concentrations in the sample collected from MW-3 are reduced relative to recent monitoring <br /> events. The concentration of MTBE detected in the groundwater sample collected from monitor well <br /> �1� CONDOR <br />