My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006698
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543479
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006698
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 10:28:16 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 9:37:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006698
RECORD_ID
PR0543479
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024679
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA'S CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
6230
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
081360030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6230 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Canepa's Car Wash <br /> 6230 Pacific Avenue,Stockton,CA <br /> First Quarter Groundwater Morutonng Report,January 2006 <br /> _ Page 6 of 9 <br /> . Groundwater is pumped from the subsurface via extraction wells MW-I and MW-I1 MW-I has <br /> contributed approximately 95% of the total groundwater influent into the treatment system The <br /> concentrations of BTEX, TPH-G, and MTBE detected in samples collected from MW-I have been <br /> increasing as anticipated and discussed above A total of 1,535,498 gallons have been treated by the <br /> system as of January 31, 2006 Calculations indicate that approximately 92 2 pounds of gasoline were <br /> removed from the groundwater at the Site during the first quarter of 2006 Furthermore, an approximate <br /> total of 314 9 pounds of gasoline have been removed since the system was made operational A <br /> calculation worksheet is included in Attachment D <br /> Vapor Phase Quantification Methodology <br /> Soil vapor mass removal and destructive efficiency calculations are made using the following <br /> methodology <br /> - Field photo-ionization detectors (PID) measurements are collected weekly and laboratory <br /> samples are collected and analyzed monthly <br /> - <br /> The data is compiled and a correction factor is calculated between corresponding PID <br /> measurements and laboratory analytical results <br /> I - The correction factor is then applied to the PID measurements so they more accurately <br /> represent projected laboratory results on a weekly basis <br /> - The corrected values are averaged, then the units of measurement are converted from parts <br /> per million of volume (ppmv)to milligrams per cubic meter(mg/m3) <br /> - The average contaminant concentration for the period is then multiplied by the total volume <br /> processed through the treatment system to yield total mass <br /> Vapor Phase Volume Measurements <br /> The airflow though the treatment system catalytic oxidizer has averaged approximately 270 cubic feet per <br /> minute (CFM) since system start-up During the first quarter of 2006 the average flow was approximately <br /> 276 6 CFM Approximately 50% of the airflow is from the groundwater air-stripper and approximately <br /> 50% from the array of nine soil vapor extraction wells Laboratory analysis of a vapor sample collected <br /> from the effluent of the air-stripper and another vapor sample collected from the effluent of the soil vapor <br /> extraction wells, both collected at the time of start-up, indicated TPH-G concentrations of 2 9 and 690 <br /> parts per million (ppm), respectively The TPH-G input to the catalytic oxidizer, therefore, is primarily <br /> from the soil vapor extraction wells Tlus is confirmed by weekly PID measurements <br /> Vapor Phase Concentration Measurements, Calculations, and Quantification <br /> During the first quarter 2006, vapor samples were collected from the catalytic oxidizer influent and <br /> effluent for laboratory analyses on November 23, 2005, December 8, 2005, and January 11, 2006 PID <br /> measurements of the influent and effluent were also collected at the same time that the laboratory samples <br /> were collected For the November 23, 2005 Iaboratory analyses, TPH-G was detected at 12 ppmv and 10 <br /> ppmv for the influent and effluent, respectively The December 8, 2005 laboratory analyses of the influent <br /> and effluent samples indicated TPH-G concentrations of 8 6 ppmv and 0 35 ppmv, respectively The <br /> January 11, 2006 laboratory analyses of the influent and effluent samples indicated TPH-G concentrations <br /> of 40 ppmv and 12 ppmv, respectively Corresponding PID measurements for the November 23, 2005 <br /> influent and effluent analyses were 3 0 ppm and 0 1 ppm, respectively The PID measurements for the <br /> December 8, 2005 influent and effluent analyses were 3 1 ppm and 0 1 ppm, respectively The PID <br /> measurements for the January 11, 2006 influent and effluent analyses were 62 ppm and 0 1 ppm, <br /> respectively A correlation was created between the TPH-G concentrations obtained from the laboratory <br /> • sample analyses and the PID measurement to provide an empirical correction factor for the PID <br /> measurements This correlation was created for concentrations from the system influent as well as the <br /> �/a CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.