Laserfiche WebLink
Canepa's Car Wash <br /> September 23, 1996 <br /> Page-6- <br /> The pore volume exchange rates for SV-1, SV-8, and SV-9 are based on a flow rate of 109 SCFM and <br /> the parameters presented below <br /> VP = IFr`h(0 3) <br /> where V,=pore volume(assuming30% , sandy silt REF Soil Mechanics Pe ff l 7 <br /> porosity,h' _ 1 ro 9 6, <br /> P 41, TbI 2 3) <br /> r = radius of influence - ROI (ft) <br /> h = height of soil column above groundwater (43 ft) <br /> Pore volume exchan a rates (a� 109 SCFM <br /> a SV-I = 15 hours <br /> b SV-8 = 2 5 hours <br /> c SV-9 = 5 5 hours <br /> i8 0 INTERNAL COMBUSTION UNIT (ICU) - DISCUSSION <br /> During the SVE evaluation, the existing ICU was started and operated for approximately 5 hours The <br /> extraction and vapor treatment system include a) a 55-gallon, water vapor knockout drum, b) the remote, <br /> SVE blower, and c) a small propane powered internal combustion engine Nine SVE well <br /> intake/extraction ports are located adjacent to the ICU system The s stem was set u to be o erated on <br /> one SVE well at_a time A 2-inch diameter hose is connected from a selected SVE well port to the <br /> knockout drum and from the knockout drum to the blower The air stream is then infected directly from <br /> the blower into the ICU carburetor by 2-inch PVC conduit The system is designed to burn the <br /> hydrocarbon vapors in the internal combustion engine and exhaust the emissions through a catalytic <br /> convertor to the atmosphere However, a valve (hole) located in tine PVC conduit, upstream from the <br /> carburetor, released extracted vapors, thereby lowering the efficiency of the system During opeiation of <br /> the system, organic vapor concentrations were measured after the blower using a PID The organic vapor <br /> concentrations ranged from 80 ppm (SV-4) to 750 (SV-7) with an average concentration of 395 ppm (see <br /> field notes, Appendix B) <br />' Based on our review of the s stem performance, the following was noted <br /> Y P � <br /> 1) The ICU appeared to be incapable of operating efficiently in its intended configuration <br /> H vaive (tioie) had been placed in the PVC conduit on the side of the intake,dust before <br /> the carburetor, to reduce the vapor concentration going into the ICU (i e , vent <br />' hydrocarbon vapors) The system would not run properly when the valve was covered, <br /> thus lowering the efficiency of the system to unacceptable levels <br /> 2) The system was manifolded to operate on one SVE well at a time In order to optimize <br /> the SVE system and decrease the time requited to remove the gasoline in the subsurface, <br /> the system should be inanifolded to operate oil various configurations of SVE wells based <br /> on the ROI of each well and the extracted vapor concentrations <br /> CONDOR <br />