My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
1665
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545638
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 11:44:53 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 10:57:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005998
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL SS#2859
STREET_NUMBER
1665
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13702031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1665 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
656
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sent by: CDAA/SJDA EPU 209 468 9784; 11118/99 I :t3PM;jeffiamL-#345;Page 8119 <br /> FEMALE: Thank you. <br /> CHAIRMAN:Thank you. Margaret Lagorio, if necessary do you wish to address? <br /> MS.LAGORIO: Oh,no I just wanted to make sure that you all were aware of the <br /> lawsuit...[can't hear-rao far from speaker] <br /> CHAIRMAN: Alright thank you. Sherry Kirk. Morning. <br /> MS.KIRK: Good morning Mr.Chairman and members of the Board, I'm Sherry Dirk,I am an <br /> attorney in private practice here in Sacramento and i'm here this morning on behalf of Unocal <br /> Corporation. My remarks are gonna be rather brief and I will then ask Ur. Cullen,who is here <br /> with us to also address the.Board,Dr. Cullen drafted the written comments first we submitted. <br /> (_ONLV6r V!,-1t- <br /> 13b just briefly I'd like to say that we eafteurrent-stafrs,recommendation needless to say and for <br /> all the reasons stated in both our closure petition and the yellmk peed petition. We believe the <br /> site should be closed at this time,however in the spirit of compromise and in line with what we <br /> have attempted to do throughout this dispute,Unocal will consent to the proposed order and <br /> continue to conduct the monitoring that it is presently conducting at the site for another year. We <br /> also urge this Board to adapt the portion of the order that requires San Joaquin County to refrain <br /> from requiring additional action at this site during the course of this additional monitoring. In <br /> our LOP Petition we also requested this Board issue a stay of San.Ioagtdn's actions and I think <br /> the events of the last 24 hours make the reasons for our request even more compelling. San <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.