My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
1665
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545638
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 11:10:28 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 11:04:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005998
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL SS#2859
STREET_NUMBER
1665
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13702031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1665 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARCADIS GERAGHTY&MILLER <br /> convenience of the automated calculation, unless a formal <br /> evaluation of the uncertainty is also included as part of the <br /> assessment. <br /> Some regulatory agencies have in the past used more simplified <br /> calculations than those described above to set soil concentration <br /> guidance levels which are designed to be protective of <br /> groundwater. These approaches have declined in usage and <br /> application as the knowledge of contaminant fate and transport has <br /> increased. Ultimately, these approaches utilize simplified models <br /> which are no less uncertain than the calculation methodology <br /> described above. <br /> Currently, there is no approach that can be considered more useful <br /> and viable for monitoring a resource medium than actually taking a <br /> sample of that medium itself. The approach presented in the work <br /> plan goes beyond predicting fixture impacts by providing the means <br /> (through the installation of a sampling point) of acquiring real-time, <br /> tangible data which demonstrates the water quality status of the site <br /> groundwater. <br /> It is the opinion of ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller that it is not <br /> necessary or appropriate to acquire saturated zone soil samples at <br /> this site in order to assess the current or future potential impacts to <br /> groundwater at the site. Groundwater samples, as previously <br /> collected at the site and proposed in this work plan, are a superior <br /> approach. <br /> However, in order to demonstrate UNOCAL's desire to cooperate <br /> and collaborate with SJCPHS, ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller will <br /> collect and analyze unsaturated zone and saturated zone soil <br /> samples at the sampling point proposed in the May 26, 1998 work <br /> plan according to the protocols described in Attachment A (also <br /> included in the May 26, 1998 work plan). Separate soil and <br /> groundwater samples will be simultaneously taken at 10-foot <br /> intervals, using the simulprobe technology, starting at ground <br /> surface down to total boring depth. Sampling will continue, as <br /> indicated in the May 26, 1998 work plan, to a minimum depth of 70 <br /> feet bgs and until two successive samples in a row contain no <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, or MTBE. Below the <br /> first encountered water, samples will be taken at maximum of 10- <br /> foot intervals or at changes in lithology. Samples will be submitted <br /> to a California State Certified Laboratory under chain of custody <br /> and analyzed for the petroleum hydrocarbon constituents of interest <br /> SJCPHS as described in section A.6 of the Attachement to the work plan. <br /> Comment: In paragraph 6, your letter states, "The proposed soil boring should <br /> be located further south and closer to MW2." <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.