My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
2402
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545640
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 2:05:07 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 1:01:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545640
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003900
FACILITY_NAME
PACIFIC PRIDE COMMERCIAL FUEL
STREET_NUMBER
2402
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12506001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2402 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�./ LI <br /> 2402 Pacific Avenue <br /> Page 2 <br /> southeast of MW2. The contamination evidenced in samples collected from MWl and <br /> B3 will require at least two monitoring wells northwest of B3 and southwest of MW1 . <br /> Also, the groundwater sample from B8 did not undergo analysis and no groundwater <br /> sample was collected from B5, so the boring proposed 50 feet east of 68 may be <br /> unnecessary. It is PHS/EHD's understanding that there was no indication of soil or <br /> groundwater contamination from samples collected from 88; therefore, the additional <br /> 50 feet east between B8 and the proposed location for further investigation, may be <br /> excessive. Please re-evaluate the proposed location east of 38. <br /> PHS/EHD concurs with the proposed locations for additional investigation north of 67 <br /> and east of MW4. <br /> As noted above, monitoring wells will be required to define the extent of the <br /> groundwater plume rather that additional Geoprobe borings. The groundwater sample <br /> results from the previous Geoprobe investigation did provide valuable information <br /> regarding the extent of soil and groundwater contamination; however, given the <br /> results obtained to date, PHS/EHD will require that a hollow stem auger drill rig be <br /> used to install the required monitoring wells and to collect the additional soil samples <br /> necessary to define the extent of soil contamination. Also, consideration should be <br /> given to the installation of at least one vapor extraction well and an air sparge well, so <br /> that feasibility analysis can be performed since active remediation will be required at <br /> this site. <br /> Furthermore, PHS/EHD indicated in correspondence dated November 5, 1996, that a <br /> proposal for the installation of additional groundwater monitoring wells must be <br /> included with the results obtained from the prior investigation. <br /> Please submit a revised addendum incorporating PHS/EHD's comments. Once <br /> PHS/EHD has reviewed and approved the revised addendum, you should obtain pre- <br /> approval from the State Water Resources Control Board Clean--up Fund Unit to ensure <br /> that the costs will be reimbursable. <br /> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (209) 468-0337. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Hea Division A�0 , <br /> Mary Meays, Senior REHS Margaret Lagorio, REHS <br /> Site Mitigation Unit Supervisor <br /> MM/2402PAC.MS <br /> cc: Elizabeth Thayer, CVRWQCB cc: Cleanup Fund Unit <br /> cc: Peter Batt, 2376 E. Armstrong, Lodi CA 95240 cc Bob Marty, AGE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.