My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005432
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
2402
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545640
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005432
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 2:54:09 PM
Creation date
5/5/2020 1:34:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005432
RECORD_ID
PR0545640
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003900
FACILITY_NAME
PACIFIC PRIDE COMMERCIAL FUEL
STREET_NUMBER
2402
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12506001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2402 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 11 August 1997 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 95-0173 <br />' Page 5 of 10 <br />' 2 3 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> On 17 July 1997, ground water levels and total well depths at MW-1 through MW-9 were measured <br /> I to the nearest 0 01-foot utilizing a 5olinst water level meter The relative ground water elevations <br /> were calculated by subtracting the depth to ground water from the relative casing elevations surveyed <br /> from a temporary benchmark assigned an arbitrary elevation (Table 4) Relative ground water <br />' elevations were plotted and contoured on a scaled site map (Figure 12 - Relative Gound Water <br /> Elevat1017Map) Ground water monitoring at this time indicated that ground water flow beneath the <br /> site was generally toward the northeast at a gradient of about 0 004, or approximately 23 feet per <br />' mile <br /> After water levels were measured, approximately six to nine gallons of ground water (minimum of <br />' three well volumes)were purged from MW-1 through MW-9 utihzing a two-stage submersible pump <br /> Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured at regular intervals using an ICM model 52200 <br /> water analyzer to track stabilization of produced water Stabilization data and field logs are included <br />' to Appendix E Purged ground water was stored in 55-gallon drums stored on-site in an area lacking <br /> public access <br />' Monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-9 were allowed to recover for a minimum of one hour prior <br /> to sample collection Ground water samples were collected utilizing a dedicated disposable <br />' polyethylene bailer and new nylon rope Sufficient sample was collected from each well to fill_ three <br /> 40-m1 EPA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a preservative, and one 1-liter amber <br /> bottle Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the VOAs after filling and <br /> capping Ground -water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and <br /> samplers initials <br /> Following collection of each ground water sample, each sample was placed in a chilled container, <br /> logged on a chain-off custody form and transported to a California state-certified Iaboratory for <br /> analysis in accordance with EPA methods 5030/8015M for TPH-g and TPH-d and for BTE&X and <br /> IMTBE in accordance with EPA method 8020 The results of the analysis are contained in Table 5 - <br /> Analytical Results Of Quay tel ly G ound Water Samples <br /> 2 3 1 STOCKPILE SOIL SAMPLES <br /> On 17 July 1997, one soil sample was collected utilizing a slide-hammer and brass sleeves from <br /> stockpiled soil at the site under the supervision of the PHS-EHD The stockpile soil sample was <br /> submitted to Castle Analytical Laboratories for laboratory analysis of TPH-g, TPH-d, BTEX and <br /> MTBE in accordance with the appropriate methods Analytical results of the soil sample are <br /> summarized in Table 1 The Iaboratory report (Castle Analytical Laboratory Reference No 113 0) and <br />' chain-of-custody are included in Appendix F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.