Laserfiche WebLink
05 December 2008 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 04-1153 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> CT214-0807006), quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) reports, and chain-of-custody forms <br /> are included in Appendix D. Laboratory electronic deliverable format (EDF) files were QA/QC <br /> checked and uploaded to the State Water Board GeoTracker site; confirmation number is <br /> 8583095729. <br /> 3.3• HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br /> A grab ground water sample was collected from boring B2 at approximately 45 feet bsg and was + <br /> analyzed for the constituents listed in Section 2.2. No targeted analytes were detected at or above <br /> laboratory detection limits in the analyzed sample. <br /> Analytical results of the ground water sample is summarized on Table 2.Laboratory reports (CTEL <br /> Project No. CT214-0807006), QA/QC reports, and chain-of-custody forms are included in <br /> Appendix D. A laboratory electronic deliverable format (EDF) f le was QA/QC checked and <br /> uploaded to the State Water Board GeoTracker site; confirmation number is 8583095729. <br /> 4.0. CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based upon the results of the site assessment, AGE presents the following conclusions: <br /> • The extent of contaminated soil has been defined,with a minor residual volume of impacted i <br /> soil near the base of the former UST excavation. <br /> • The analysis of the ground water sample indicted no petroleum hydrocarbon impact to the <br /> shallow ground water. <br /> i <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the conclusions presented in this report,AGE recommends the following: <br /> • No further action required; site closure. <br /> J <br /> i <br /> I <br /> Advanced Gco$nvironmental,Inc. <br />