My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013199
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
10400
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2000023
>
SU0013199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:48:19 PM
Creation date
5/7/2020 3:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013199
PE
2620
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2000023
STREET_NUMBER
10400
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240-
APN
05112088
ENTERED_DATE
4/27/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
10400 E HWY 12
RECEIVED_DATE
4/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Potentially Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Si nificant Significant with Si nificant No In The <br /> 9 Mitigation 9 <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial <br /> adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> death involving: <br /> i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br /> delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo <br /> Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the <br /> State Geologist for the area or based on other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br /> Division of Mines and Geology Special <br /> Publication 42. <br /> ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ X <br /> iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ X� F1 ❑ <br /> liquefaction? <br /> iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ X <br /> b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ —1 F-1topsoil? X❑ <br /> c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, <br /> or that would become unstable as a result of the <br /> project, and potentially result in on- or off-site ❑ ❑ ❑ 1:1landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br /> or collapse? <br /> d) Be located on expansive soil and create direct or ❑ F] ❑ � ❑ <br /> indirect risks to life or property? <br /> e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the <br /> use of septic tanks or alternative waste water ❑ ❑ ❑ F-1disposal systems where sewers are not available for <br /> the disposal of waste water? <br /> f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br /> paleontological resource or site or unique geologic F] El ❑ Elfeature? <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> The Soil Survey of San Joaquin County classifies the soil on the parcel as Acampo sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes; <br /> and Tokay fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes. <br /> Acampo sandy loam's permeability is very slow and water capacity is low. This unit is suited to irrigated pasture.Acampo <br /> sandy loam has a storie index rating of 57 and a land capability of Illw irrigated and IVw nonirrigated. <br /> Tokay fine sandy loam's permeability is moderately rapid and water capacity is high. This unit is suited to irrigated row <br /> crops. Tokay fine sandy loam has a storie index rating of 95 and a land capability of I irrigated and IVc nonirrigated. <br /> The geology of San Joaquin County is composed of high organic alluvium, which is susceptible to earthquake movement. <br /> PA-1900243 (UP) & PA-2000023 (DA) – Initial Study 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.