Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. James Barton <br /> ' October 31,2002 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> '• GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> ' On September 25, 2002, SECOR sounded five groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-5) <br /> using an electronic water-level indicator graduated to 0.01 feet. The depth-to-groundwater was measured <br /> in each well and recorded on the water sample data field sheets included in Appendix A. The water-level <br /> indicator was rinsed with deionized water between the sounding of each well to minimize the potential for <br /> cross contamination. <br /> In accordance with the revised MRP, the sampling plan for the Third Quarter 2002 as shown on the table <br /> ' below. <br /> QI Q2 Q3 Q4 <br /> ' MW-1 NS NS NS NS <br /> MW-2 NS NS TPH PHd NS <br /> MW-3* TPHWTPHd TPH Hd TPH PHd TPHgtTPHd <br /> MW-4 TPH PHd TPH PHd TPH PHd TPHg1TPHd <br /> MW-5 NS NS NS NS <br /> * Sample well MW-3 only if no free-product is present. <br /> NS-Not Sampled <br /> Prior to sampling, wells were purged of approximately three casing volumes of water using a dedicated <br /> disposable PVC bailer. During purging, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature of the evacuated <br /> groundwater were measured, and the groundwater was visually observed for color, turbidity, and the <br /> ' presence of floating chemical product. Physical parameters were recorded on water sample field data <br /> sheets included in Appendix A. <br /> Upon removal of the appropriate purge volume, stabilization of the measured parameters, and allowing <br /> ' water level recovery to 80 percent of the static level; samples were collected from each well using a <br /> dedicated disposable PVC bailer. Groundwater samples were decanted into prelabeled laboratory- <br /> supplied glassware, placed in an ice-filled cooler, and transported under chain-of-custody documentation <br /> ' to STL San Francisco of Pleasanton, California, a state-certified analytical laboratory. Third Quarter <br /> 2002 groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg and TPHd by modified EPA Method 8015. <br /> Laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody records are included in Appendix B. <br /> ' Results of quarterly groundwater monitoring activities for the Third Quarter 2002 are summarized with <br /> historical results in Table 1. <br /> ' Groundwater Elevations <br /> ' A groundwater elevation contour map based on the Third Quarter 2002 groundwater elevation data is <br /> presented as Figure 3. During the September 25, 2002 monitoring event, groundwater elevations ranged <br /> from -13.04 to 2.09 feet relative to mean sea level (msl). The maximum groundwater elevation change <br /> between the Second and Third Quarter 2002 monitoring events was an increase of 3.24 feet in well MW- <br /> ' 5. Historical groundwater sounding data is summarized in Table 2. <br /> Interpretation of the groundwater elevation contour map created from the Third Quarter 2002 sounding <br /> data indicates groundwater flow is directed away from Potato Slough towards the southeast under an <br /> I:\Tower Park\QMR\2002 QMR\Q3-2002\3rd QTR 2002.doc SECOR International Inc. <br /> SECOR lob No.050T.02926 11/1/02 1:56 PM <br />