Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> • <br />' 1.0. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br /> 2.0 PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 <br />' 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION 1 <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING 2 <br /> 23 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES 2 <br />' 3.0. FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 <br /> I <br /> 31 GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT 3 <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES 3 <br />' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 <br />' 6.0. LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 <br /> FIGURES <br /> • FIGURE 1 - Location Map <br /> FIGURE 2 - Site Map <br /> FIGURE 3 - Ground Water Elevation Map 05 September 2002 <br /> I FIGURE 4 -Approximate Extent of Dissolved TPH-g September 2002 <br /> FIGURE 5 -Approximate Extent of Dissolved TPH-d September 2002 <br /> FIGURE 6 -Approximate Extent of Dissolved MTBE September 2002 <br />' TABLES <br /> TABLE 1 - Summary of Monitoring Well Details <br />' TABLE 2 - Ground Water Elevation Data <br /> TABLE 3 -Analytical Results of Ground Water Samples - Site Investigation <br /> TABLE 4 -Analytical Results of Ground Water Samples - 05 September 2002 <br /> APPENDICES <br /> IAPPENDIX A -Flag City Chevron Monitoring Data <br /> APPENDIX B - Ground Water Monitoring Field Logs <br /> APPENDIX C -Laboratory Reports of Analytical Results <br /> • <br /> I <br />