My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013248
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
17749
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
QX-90-1
>
SU0013248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:24:21 AM
Creation date
5/8/2020 10:56:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013248
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
QX-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
17749
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
CLEMENTS
Zip
95227-
APN
01922024
ENTERED_DATE
5/6/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
17749 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 . a. No threatened or endangered species or habitats were iden- <br /> tified on the site from information contained in the <br /> Natural Diversity Data Bank. The application states that <br /> the "natural vegetation" along the riverbank will be pro- <br /> tected. An on-site survey, however , needs to be conducted <br /> to accurately assess the site ' s biotic resources, the <br /> effect of the project on those resources, and any required <br /> mitigation measures. The survey shall include a discussion <br /> of the area' s potential as a site for establishment of <br /> riparian habitat . <br /> 3 .b. In addition to the comments contained in Item No . 3 (a) , it <br /> should be noted that the site is downstream from the <br /> Comanche Reservoir and the Mokelumne River Fish <br /> Installation. Any erosion, siltation, removal of riparian <br /> habitat , or streambed alteration that might occur as a <br /> result of this project can be expected to have an adverse <br /> effect on the aquatic environment and the river ' s fish <br /> population. The information required in Item No . 1 (c) <br /> should address the project ' s effects on the river and the <br /> necessary .mitigation measures to address those effects . <br /> 4 . a . The operation of the quarry may generate a significant <br /> amount of dust . Potential sources include the removal of <br /> groundcover , extraction, loading and unloading, hauling , <br /> and processing of the quarry material . <br /> 6 .b . While the proposed project will reduce the area' s aggregate <br /> resources , that reduction is not considered to be an <br /> adverse effect . The site is within a significant aggregate <br /> resource area, as identified by the State Division of Mines <br /> and Geology. The siting of excavation projectE, within <br /> areas of significant deposits is encouraged by State and <br /> County policies . <br /> 8 . a. The project has the potential to generate , at peak opera- <br /> tion, 200 one-way truck trips per week. The presence of <br /> that many trucks operating on public roadways has the <br /> potential to create congestion and circulation problems , as <br /> well as to possibly increase the incidence of traffic acci- <br /> dents and to damage the actual roadways . The further ana- <br /> lysis that is required must include a comparison of the <br /> potential traffic generated by this project with existing <br /> levels at the Featherstone Quarry for net changes in <br /> volume . The specific intersections and sections of roadway <br /> will be identified in the Request For Proposal if an <br /> Environmental Impact Report is prepared for this project . <br /> 9 . No archaeological or historical sites or structures are <br /> known to exist on the subject parcel . In order to verify <br /> this statement , though, a survey will have to be conducted <br /> on that portion of the parcel adjacent to the river where <br /> mature native vegetation may have supported the presence of <br /> an indigenous Indian population. The portion of the site <br /> proposed for excavation is not expected to yield any <br /> Initial Study - 2 - (QX-90-1 ) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.