My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
6100
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516379
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:34 PM
Creation date
5/8/2020 12:12:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0516379
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012587
FACILITY_NAME
OAK RIDGE WINERY LLC
STREET_NUMBER
6100
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04912034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6100 E HWY 12
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Quarterly Monitoring Report- Fourth Quarter 2014 Page 7 <br /> OAK RIDGE WINERY <br /> WKA No. 6364.07 <br /> December 18, 2014 <br /> ' been a "measurably significant" change in the constituents of concern versus background <br /> concentrations in groundwater. <br /> ' The followingresents th <br /> p e results of the statistical analysis using Analysis of Variation (ANOVA) <br /> ' as specified in the referenced section of CCR Title 27. Parametric ANOVA evaluation of the <br /> data was conducted using the Single Factor ANOVA function built into the Microsoft° Excel° <br /> spreadsheet software package. The input data and output results of each evaluation are <br /> ' included in Appendix E. Table E-1 of Appendix E presents the input values and Tables E-2 <br /> through E-9 present the output results from the evaluation. <br /> In general, the parametric ANOVA analysis indicates there are significant differences in the <br /> means of four of the six data sets. The ANOVA evaluation of pH and nitrate indicate there is no <br /> measurably significant variation in the means. It should be noted that the nitrate significance <br /> test is trivial because the input values are based predominantly on one-half the laboratory <br /> reporting limits. Nitrate was not detected at a concentration exceeding its laboratory reporting <br /> limit in each sample analyzed. The table below presents F-critical and F, which when <br /> compared, indicate whether or not significant(non-random) difference in the means of the data <br /> ' exists. <br /> ' NH3 K NO3 pH TKN TDS Log Log [TDS] <br /> [TKN] <br /> Data F-crit 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.64 2.65 2.64 2.65 <br /> Sets F 17.69 72.26 1.76 1.62 45.73 17.03 204.9 69.02 <br /> Notes: <br /> NH3—Ammonia pH — loci fH+] <br /> K— Potassium TKN —Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen <br /> NO3 - Nitrate TDS —Total Dissolved Solids <br /> ' Where F isreater than F-crit there likely y i s a significant difference in the means. As shown, F <br /> ' is greater than F-crit in six of the eight evaluations. F does not exceed F-crit in two of the data <br /> set evaluations (Nitrate and pH). <br /> Because groundwater constituent concentrations typically are not normally distributed, the data <br /> sets for TKN and TDS were also transformed using logarithm (logia) function and evaluated <br /> ' using ANOVA. The transformed data do not, upon inspection, appear to have been significantly <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.