My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
12 (STATE ROUTE 12)
>
8751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516580
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 3:47:36 PM
Creation date
5/8/2020 1:56:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516580
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012688
FACILITY_NAME
WILD ROSE VINEYARDS
STREET_NUMBER
8751
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 12
City
VICTOR
Zip
95253
APN
05139005
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8751 E HWY 12
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Report • • -2- <br /> R. Lawson Enterprises, LLC dba WildRose Vineyards <br /> report, and an Operation and Wastewater Management Plan. Each of these reports was due by <br /> dates specified in the WDRs. In addition,the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP)portion <br /> of the WDRs requires the submittal of monthly self-monitoring reports. <br /> On 26 October 2000, staff issued a Notice of Violation(NOV)citing the Discharger for: <br /> a) failure to submit a report describing installation of a flow meter to measure the flow of winery <br /> wastewater to the land application areas, how stormwater flows had been separated from <br /> wastewater flows,the installation of the 12,000 gallon tank, and how the wastewater from the <br /> CFP facility had been separated from the winery wastewater; and b) failure to submit a <br /> groundwater monitoring well installation workplan. The NOV required the Discharger to submit <br /> the overdue reports by 8 December 2000. <br /> On 28 December 2000, staff contacted the Discharger by telephone inquiring about the overdue <br /> reports and failure to submit self-monitoring reports. Staff advised the Discharger the continued <br /> pattern of noncompliance would likely result in an enforcement action, including imposition of <br /> an Administrative Civil Liability(ACL). <br /> On 21 March 2001, staff provided a conditional approval of a Draft Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Workplan. As required by WDRs Provision F.2.b, the workplan was to be submitted by <br /> 6 October 2000; however, the Draft Workplan was not received at the Regional Board office <br /> until 16 January 2001. Staff's conditional approval required that technical issues be addressed in <br /> a final workplan,which was to be signed and stamped by a California Registered Engineer or <br /> Geologist. Submittal of the final report was required by 21 April 2001. The Discharger has <br /> failed to submit the report. 'The conditional approval letter also required the Discharger to <br /> expedite installation of the monitoring wells,because the Discharger was significantly behind the <br /> schedule contained in the WDRs. <br /> On 11 April 2001, staff contacted the Discharger by facsimile machine, stating that a number of <br /> items required in the WDRs had not been satisfied, that monitoring reports had not been <br /> submitted, and that continued noncompliance could result in an ACL. <br /> On 11 April 2001,the Discharger submitted self-monitoring reports for the months of January <br /> 2001, February 2001, and March 2001. The reports are incomplete because they did not include <br /> flow rates and did not contain monitoring of sulfate and total dissolved solids concentrations in <br /> the wastewater applied to the land application areas. Since adoption of Order No. 5-00-182 in <br /> August 2000,the Discharger has failed to submit any other monthly monitoring reports. <br /> The Discharger has submitted three partially complete monitoring reports but to date has failed <br /> to submit reports showing installation of a flow meter, installed groundwater monitoring wells, <br /> or made improvements to the wastewater treatment system. In addition, the Discharger has <br /> failed to submit complete monthly monitoring reports as required by the WDRs. Staff discussed <br /> these issues with the Discharger during an inspection on 26 July 2001. The Discharger was <br /> advised that unless the outstanding reports were submitted immediately, it was likely that the <br /> Executive Officer would issue an ACL. No reports were received. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.