Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 3 <br /> s. U <br /> J <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> .From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> i ''Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 1:11 PM <br /> To: 'Chris Strong' <br /> Subject: RE:.UST#3 -4th Quarter Monitoring Report <br /> Not per say...but you'll probably need the data onewould provide to figure out <br /> the estimated time for gw to reach WQOs. You will need to explain to us that the <br /> mass loading of the residual soil contaminant mass to the gw is no longer <br /> occurring, or occurring as some declining rate. This calculation should provide <br /> you with data/information to extrapolate when all loading to the gw is done and <br /> when the natural degradation/dispersion rates reach a level that provides for <br /> 1 Basin Plan Water Quality objectives being 'met. <br /> See? <br /> But NO.] do not need a document called, "Fate Transport"... <br /> i <br /> i <br /> From: Chris Strong [mailto:cstrong@wgr-sw.com] <br /> 4Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011.11:22 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> i Subject: RE: UST#3 - 4th Quarter Monitoring Report <br /> d <br /> You don't need a fate/transport model do you? <br /> i Chris Strong, PG <br /> Senior Geologist <br /> WGR Southwestjnc: <br /> 315 W. Pine Street, Suite 8 <br />,. Lodi, CA 95240 <br /> cstrong(d�wgr-sw.com <br /> off: (209)334-5363 ext. 206 <br /> cefl: (209)487-4802 <br /> fax: (209) 334-5374 <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, October 28, 20113:34 PM <br /> To: Chris Strong <br /> Subject: RE: UST #3 - 4th Quarter Monitoring Report <br /> Chris, <br /> Oh why not? Seems to be the trend....and I'm.ok with it... <br /> Please follow the TriRegional Guidelines section 6.6 for the NFAR format: <br /> Include the CVRWQCB `checklist' too. <br /> In additions; <br /> it <br /> 11/15/2011 <br /> I <br />