My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545660
>
SITE HISTORY_CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2020 3:16:07 PM
Creation date
5/12/2020 1:57:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE HISTORY
FileName_PostFix
CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0545660
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003909
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
295
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' - Page 2 of 3 <br /> i <br /> 1-.support declining trend, not increasing trend in gw concentrations in the <br /> core and down-gradient, <br /> 2-provide mass estimates/cal <br /> cuiations for residual mass left in place, <br /> 3-time for gw concentrations to.reach Water Quality Objectives in our Basin <br /> Plan (Not MCLs). <br /> 4-impact to or potential impact to sensitive receptors (drinking water wells, <br /> surface water, etc). <br /> These four, added to a.good NFAR will get you on the list of NFARs to be <br /> reviewed. <br /> had 17 WARS since Feb 2011 . I've reviewed 7 so far, I'm reviewing two <br /> more now, and I'm removing wells at four sites that have received <br /> CVRWQCB closure concurrence . It's real busy here so plan accordingly. <br /> Add to this my planned retirement in Feb 2012 and chances are I won't be <br /> the one reviewing your NFAR, but l can get you started. <br /> After your NFAR is received,.yot' may request a reduction in sampling, but <br /> the site must be monitored. You can do this by turning in quarterly `letter' <br /> status reports to Geotracker. If the EHD determines additional gw data is . <br /> needed after reviewing the NEAR, you'll be asked to conduct .another <br /> sampling event. <br /> Good luck.. <br /> Mike <br /> From: Chris Strong [mailto:cstron.g@wgr-sw.com] ` <br /> Sent: Friday, October 28, 20119:14 AM. <br /> To; Mike Infurna [EH]_ <br /> Cc: 'Koehnen, Rita' <br /> Subject: UST #3 - 4th Quarter Monitoring Report f <br /> Hi Mike, I have uploaded the 4u, Quarter Monitoring Report'ort for the UST#3 Site. We think that <br /> I <br /> this case is suitable for closure so I plan to compile all our data in a report requesting case <br /> closure. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Chris Strong, PG <br /> Senior Geo€ogist <br /> WGR Southwest, Inc. <br /> 315 W. Pine Street, Suite 8 <br /> Lodi, CA 95240 <br /> cstrong a@wgr-sw.com <br /> off: (209)334-5363 ext. 206 <br /> cell'(209)487-4802' <br /> fax: (209)334-5374 <br /> 11/15/2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.