Laserfiche WebLink
The mean concentration and 90%UCL values for total lead data were less than 350 mg/kg. This <br /> suggests that the soil, if treated as a whole and sampled on a composite basis from stockpiles <br /> generated during construction activities,may not require Class I disposal and may be handled <br /> within the conditions of the variance. <br /> The excavated soil will likely not require soluble lead analysis by the WET as the mean and 90% <br /> UCL are less than 50 mg/kg, a level that triggers the WET analysis when considering soil <br /> disposal options. Even if WET analyses are conducted it is not likely that composite soil <br /> samples would contain soluble lead at concentrations greater than the STLC as the predicted <br /> soluble lead concentration and 90%UCL value for soluble lead by the WET are less than 5 mg/l. <br /> The composite soil profile for the project would likely have soluble lead concentrations less than <br /> the STLC and would not be considered a California hazardous waste. <br /> If management of the soil within the variance is required based on soluble lead concentrations, <br /> the statistical data indicate that the soil would be allowed to be re-used within condition 1 of the <br /> proposed variance, if the soil is excavated and treated as a whole (0 to 0.6 meters). This <br /> condition requires that the soil be used as fill beneath at least one foot of clean (non-hazardous) <br /> soil and five feet above the water table. <br /> 4.2 UST Investigation Results <br /> The geophysical surveys did not detect evidence of potential USTs within the areas surveyed at <br /> the northeast and northwest corners of the intersection. The geophysical surveys did detect an <br /> anomaly in the area surveyed at the southwest corner of the intersection. It was not known <br /> whether the anomaly was created by a UST or a utility vault associated with nearby underground <br /> utilities (Appendix D). <br /> The only constituents reported in the deeper soil samples included in the UST investigation were <br /> TPHd(960 mg/kg) in a soil sample collected from approximately 1.2 meters (4 feet)BGS within <br /> boring HP-1 and TPHmo (53.7 mg/kg) in a soil sample collected from approximately 1.2 meters <br /> (4 feet)BGS within boring HP-2. Additionally, organic lead was reported in a soil sample <br /> collected from approximately 7.9 meters (26 feet)BGS within boring HP-1 (Table 2). Organic <br /> lead, consisting of tetraethyl lead and/or tetramethyl lead,was used as a gasoline additive to raise <br /> octane ratings and lubricate soft metal valves. The reported organic lead concentration was <br /> 14 mg/kg. The reported organic lead concentration exceeds the EPA, Region 9, residential soil <br /> Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) of 0.0061 mg/kg (EPA, 2000). <br /> SncDP-N:IruncjpllProjecisl8P8?11641Reportlll0 Austin repon.doc 4-5 <br /> 5121101 <br />