My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516706
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:01:08 PM
Creation date
5/13/2020 3:27:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0516706
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0012748
FACILITY_NAME
CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
MANTECA
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
HWY 120
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The mean concentration and 90%UCL values for total lead data were less than 350 mg/kg. This <br /> suggests that the soil, if treated as a whole and sampled on a composite basis from stockpiles <br /> generated during construction activities,may not require Class I disposal and may be handled <br /> within the conditions of the variance. <br /> The excavated soil will likely not require soluble lead analysis by the WET as the mean and 90% <br /> UCL are less than 50 mg/kg, a level that triggers the WET analysis when considering soil <br /> disposal options. Even if WET analyses are conducted it is not likely that composite soil <br /> samples would contain soluble lead at concentrations greater than the STLC as the predicted <br /> soluble lead concentration and 90%UCL value for soluble lead by the WET are less than 5 mg/l. <br /> The composite soil profile for the project would likely have soluble lead concentrations less than <br /> the STLC and would not be considered a California hazardous waste. <br /> If management of the soil within the variance is required based on soluble lead concentrations, <br /> the statistical data indicate that the soil would be allowed to be re-used within condition 1 of the <br /> proposed variance, if the soil is excavated and treated as a whole (0 to 0.6 meters). This <br /> condition requires that the soil be used as fill beneath at least one foot of clean (non-hazardous) <br /> soil and five feet above the water table. <br /> 4.2 UST Investigation Results <br /> The geophysical surveys did not detect evidence of potential USTs within the areas surveyed at <br /> the northeast and northwest corners of the intersection. The geophysical surveys did detect an <br /> anomaly in the area surveyed at the southwest corner of the intersection. It was not known <br /> whether the anomaly was created by a UST or a utility vault associated with nearby underground <br /> utilities (Appendix D). <br /> The only constituents reported in the deeper soil samples included in the UST investigation were <br /> TPHd(960 mg/kg) in a soil sample collected from approximately 1.2 meters (4 feet)BGS within <br /> boring HP-1 and TPHmo (53.7 mg/kg) in a soil sample collected from approximately 1.2 meters <br /> (4 feet)BGS within boring HP-2. Additionally, organic lead was reported in a soil sample <br /> collected from approximately 7.9 meters (26 feet)BGS within boring HP-1 (Table 2). Organic <br /> lead, consisting of tetraethyl lead and/or tetramethyl lead,was used as a gasoline additive to raise <br /> octane ratings and lubricate soft metal valves. The reported organic lead concentration was <br /> 14 mg/kg. The reported organic lead concentration exceeds the EPA, Region 9, residential soil <br /> Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) of 0.0061 mg/kg (EPA, 2000). <br /> SncDP-N:IruncjpllProjecisl8P8?11641Reportlll0 Austin repon.doc 4-5 <br /> 5121101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.