My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008818
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
26 (STATE ROUTE 26)
>
8203
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545707
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 8:48:27 AM
Creation date
5/13/2020 4:01:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008818
RECORD_ID
PR0545707
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003591
FACILITY_NAME
JOHN M RISHWAIN
STREET_NUMBER
8203
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 26
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215-9536
APN
10114021
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
8203 E HWY 26
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> . 01 March 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0645 <br /> Page 5 of 11 <br /> 2 3 2 SVE Pilot Test Sampling and Analysis <br /> A total of four soil vapor samples were collected during each pilot test Soil vapor samples were <br /> collected at two-hour intervals from the sample port of the extraction well to measure hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations in the extracted gas The samples were collected in Tedlar bags using an air pump <br /> Samples were transported in a chilled container under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, <br /> Inc (MAI),a California Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified laboratory Each sample was <br /> analyzed within 72 hours for <br /> • TPH-g in accordance with EPA Method 8015M, and <br /> • BTEX and MTBE in accordance with EPA Method 8021 <br /> 2 4 QUARTERLY GROUND WATER MONITORING PROCEDURES <br /> Field work was performed in accordance with procedures outlined in Initial Work Plan for <br /> Preliminary Site Assessment,prepared by AGE,dated 30 November 2000, and approved by the San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) by letter dated 13 December 2000 <br /> 2 4 1 Monitoring Well Evacuation and Monitoring <br /> On 06 October 2003, the water level in each of three monitoring wells was measured relative to the <br /> top of the well casing using a Solmst water level meter After water levels were measured, a <br /> dedicated,disposable plastic bailer was used to purge each well Three gallons(a minimum of three <br /> well volumes) of water were removed from the wells Temperature, pH and conductivity of the <br /> purged water were measured at one-gallon intervals using an Oakton water analyzer during purging, <br /> and the values had generally stabilized by the end of the purging process (Appendix D) Purged <br /> water was stored on-site in 55-gallon, DOT-approved drums <br /> 2 4 2 Collection and Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> Prior to collection of ground water samples,the depth to ground water was measured in each purged <br /> well to ensure that a minimum of 80% of the well volume had recharged A water sample was <br /> collected from each well using a new disposable plastic bailer Each water sample was transferred <br /> into three chilled 40-mL volatile organic analysis (VOA)vials containing 0 5 mL hydrochloric acid <br /> (18%) as a sample preservative and one 1-liter amber bottle After collection, the samples were <br /> labeled and placed in a chilled container for transportation under chain-of-custody to MAI, a <br /> California DHS-certified analytical laboratory, in Pacheco, California <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.