My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SCOTTS
>
540
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507144
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 2:02:41 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 1:32:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0507144
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007712
FACILITY_NAME
ACME STOCKTON GALVANIZING
STREET_NUMBER
540
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SCOTTS
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14704048
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
540 W SCOTTS AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 (6) Time Schedule for Remedial Investigation (RI) <br /> 2 Workplan Implementation from Date of Department <br /> 3 Approval, to include: <br /> 4 (a) Field Investigation; <br /> 5 (b) Laboratory Analysis; <br /> 6 (c) Interim Reports Submittal ; <br /> 7 (d) Engineering Analysis of Data Collected; <br /> 8 (e) Submittal of Final Remedial Investigation <br /> 9 Report. <br /> 10 b. The Remedial Investigation Report portion of the <br /> 11 Workplan shall describe the steps necessary to submit <br /> 12 this report in compliance with paragraph 5. 1. 4 . <br /> 13 C. The Feasibility Study portion of the Workplan shall <br /> 14 include a plan for providing at least the following <br /> 15 elements in the Feasibility Study: <br /> 16 (1) A summary of the existing and potential hazards <br /> 17 for which corrective action is required; <br /> 18 (2) A description of the alternative remedial <br /> 19 actions which will be evaluated; <br /> 20 (3) A list of the technologies which will be <br /> 21 screened for each alternative remedial action <br /> 22 described in (2) above; <br /> 23 (4) A description of the factors which will be <br /> 24 considered in screening and analyzing each <br /> 25 alternative remedial action technology, <br /> 26 including, but not limited to, effectiveness, <br /> 27 reliability, timeliness of implementation, unit <br /> GOURTPAPER <br /> YTATI OF CALIFORNIA <br /> $TD. 113 IREV. 6-731 -17_ <br /> E5 31JB9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.