My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6632
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0530340
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 2:32:56 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 2:09:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0530340
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0019834
FACILITY_NAME
PROPOSED FRESH & EASY NBRHD MKT
STREET_NUMBER
6632
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
08126020
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6632 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposal No. P1-410-0587 <br /> August 27,2010 <br /> Page 2 <br /> by which chemicals in soil and groundwater can migrate into indoor air. Chemical vapors moving up <br /> through soil and into a building are a potential source of indoor air contamination and may pose a <br /> risk to human health. Consequently,SALEM recommends conducting a soil vapor gas survey within <br /> the proposed subject building footprint for the purpose of assessing potential indoor vapor <br /> concentrations associated with the proposed Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market building. <br /> Additionally, SALEM recommends placement of a vapor barrier beneath the proposed subject <br /> building's concrete slab-on-grade foundation to prevent the potential migration of chemical vapors <br /> into the subject building interior. <br /> Based upon the historical use of petroleum hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents at the subject site vicinity, <br /> and the presence of these compounds in soil and groundwater in the area adjacent north of the proposed <br /> Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market tenant space, it was SALEM's opinion that a potential vapor intrusion <br /> condition may exist within the proposed tenant space as a result of past releases of these constituents from <br /> former fuel storage and dispensing and/or dry cleaning operations into on-site soil and groundwater. <br /> Because of the above potential for vapor intrusion, SALEM recommended conducting a Limited Soils <br /> Assessment of the subject property's shallow soils to determine the presence or absence of VOCs (including <br /> chlorinated solvents) related to the historical use of the subject property vicinity for fuel storage and dispensing <br /> and/or dry cleaning operations, and for the purpose of determining if historical or current property uses may <br /> have impacted the subject property. This proposal has been prepared to address SALEM's recommendation <br /> for additional subsurface investigation. <br /> 2.0 SAMPLING RATIONALE <br /> In 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released "OSWER Draft Guidance for Evaluating the <br /> Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion <br /> Guidance)".This draft guidance recommends a tiered approach to evaluation of the vapor intrusion pathway. <br /> This guidance includes record sheets containing a series of questions that guide users through a stepwise <br /> evaluation of the subsurface vapor intrusion pathway. The EPA recommends an assessment of the vapor <br /> intrusion pathway include multiple lines of evidence if available. <br /> The first tier of the USEPA's tiered approach to evaluation of the vapor intrusion pathway includes an <br /> evaluation of COCs for volatility and potential for toxicity. The second tier includes a comparison of <br /> analytical data collected in groundwater or soil gas to conservative groundwater screening levels. These target <br /> groundwater concentrations will be back calculated from risk-based target indoor air concentrations and an <br /> indoor air to groundwater attenuation factor of 0.001 (USEPA, 2002). In the event that concentrations in <br /> groundwater exceed these screening levels, soil gas samples may also be collected. The analytical data from <br /> these soil gas samples are then compared to conservative soil gas screening levels. In the event that site <br /> conditions or data limitations preclude the use of these screening levels, or if a refined vapor pathway <br /> assessment is warranted, a site-specific vapor pathway assessment (Tier 3) may be conducted using the <br /> Johnson&Ettinger model,additional site-specific data collection,or a combination of both(USEPA,2002). <br /> A previous Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (by others) just north of the subject site property noted <br /> the presence of naphthalene on soil at a depth of 5 feet bgs and PCE in groundwater at a depth of <br /> approximately 40 feet bgs. Please refer to Figure 1 (attached) for sample locations. Based on the presence of <br /> known or suspected soil vapor sources on the subject site, collection of soil gas samples is recommended to <br /> refine the vapor intrusion pathway assessment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.