My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SECOND HALF AND ANNUAL 2010 GW MONITORING RPT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STOCKTON
>
942
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516727
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_SECOND HALF AND ANNUAL 2010 GW MONITORING RPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2020 4:35:31 PM
Creation date
5/14/2020 3:13:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
SECOND HALF AND ANNUAL 2010 GW MONITORING RPT
RECORD_ID
PR0516727
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012758
FACILITY_NAME
DIAMOND FOOD PROCESSORS OF RIPON
STREET_NUMBER
942
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STOCKTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
25934012
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
942 S STOCKTON AVE
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
480
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Diamond Pet Food Processors of Ripon California LLC Januan'28, 2011 <br /> Combined Annual and Fourth-Ouarter 2010 Groundwater Monitoring Report Page 4 of 8 <br /> wells) indicates that this water is less mineralized than that in other wells. River water is <br /> characterized by increasing relative percentages of magnesium+calcium and bicarbonate while <br /> mill effluent has been characterized by increasing relative percentages of sodium and <br /> chloride+sulfate.1 <br /> Figure 3 presents Stiff patterns for all wells in the DP network. The patterns illustrate that the <br /> best groundwater quality is in the southeast part of the site.and the most degraded groundwater <br /> quality is in the northeastern part of the site. As with analysis of groundwater quality contour <br /> maps, the poorest water quality in the northeast can be attributed to the concentration of <br /> constituents from evapotranspiration by the eucalyptus trees in this area.2 <br /> 2nd-Half 2010 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Third-quarter 2010 groundwater monitoring was performed on July 19, 2010 (Table 3 <br /> [following text]) and fourth-quarter monitoring was performed between October 11 and 14, <br /> 2010 (Table 4 [following text]). <br /> Third-Quarter 2010 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Findings <br /> Mounding within the semiperched aquifer occurred onsite in the vicinity of the west percolation <br /> field and offsite north of the City of Ripon's municipal waste-water treatment facility <br /> (MWWTF) ponds and their fresh water infiltration pond. The direction of the groundwater <br /> gradient was away from the mounds then generally towards the north. The magnitude of the <br /> gradient ranged between 0.00097 and 0.0029 feet/foot (ft/ft; Figure 4). <br /> Mounding also was present in the upper aquifer in approximately the same general areas where <br /> mounding was observed in the semiperched aquifer. The direction of the groundwater gradient <br /> was away from the mounds, then generally towards the north. The magnitude of the gradient <br /> ranged between 0.00071 and 0,0011 ft/ft (Figure 5). <br /> Mounding within the intermediate aquifer was present in approximately the same general areas <br /> where mounding was observed in both the semiperched and upper aquifers. The direction of the <br /> groundwater gradient was away from the mounds, then generally towards the north. The <br /> magnitude of the gradient ranged between 0.0005 and 0.003 (Figure 6). <br /> Fourth-Quarter 2010 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Findings <br /> Mounding within the semiperched aquifer occurred offsite in the vicinity of the City of Ripon's <br /> MWWTF ponds and their fresh water infiltration pond. The gradient was extremely flat across <br /> most of the DP site. The direction of the groundwater gradient was away from the mound then <br /> generally towards the north. The magnitude of the gradient ranged between 0.0031 and 0.0017 <br /> feet/foot (ft/ft; Figure 7). <br /> Mounding also was present in the upper aquifer in approximately the same general areas where <br /> mounding was observed in the semiperched aquifer. The direction of the groundwater gradient <br /> L&A,November 17,2008,Five-Year A'ater Quality Review Report. <br /> 'Ibid.P. 8 <br /> 10107.01 Task 2 Lawrence&Associates <br /> OSICLIENTSIDiatond Pet FoodsI070107.01-Groundwater MaWwringlGroundwater Mon/toring1201012nd Ha/f_ ffiamata/-2nd Hatr <br /> 2010 repon.doe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.