My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23665
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0526080
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 8:53:51 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 8:47:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0526080
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0017647
FACILITY_NAME
RIVERBANK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLNT
STREET_NUMBER
23865
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95367
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23865 S SANTA FE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> REVISED CLEANUP AND ABATEMENT ORDER NO. 5-01-703 <br /> FOR <br /> CITY OF RIVERBANK <br /> WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT <br /> STANISLAUS COUNTY <br /> This Order is issued to the City of Riverbank based on provisions of California Water Code Section <br /> 13304 which authorize the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region (hereafter <br /> known as "Board")to issue a Cleanup and Abatement Order. <br /> The Board finds that, with respect to the City of Riverbank's acts, or failure to act, the following: <br /> 1• The City of Riverbank owns and operates a municipal wastewater treatment plant west of County <br /> Road J7 and adjacent to the north bank of the Stanislaus River in San Joaquin County. The <br /> facility(Assessor's Parcel Nos. 247-25004, 247-26002, 249-07022, and 249-06009) is in Section <br /> 23, T2S, R9E, MDB&M. <br /> 2. The facility is subject to Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order No. 94-100, and is <br /> pennitted to treat up to 7.9 million gallons per day(mgd) of domestic and industrial wastewater. <br /> 3. Wastewater is conveyed to the treatment plant via a sewer main that crosses the Stanislaus River. <br /> Following gross solids removal at the headworks, influent is discharged to the Summer Aeration <br /> Cell. From there, it flows to the Summer 1 Pond, which also has aerators at the eastern end. <br /> Treated effluent then flows through a series of percolation/evaporation ponds (Summer 2, Summer <br /> 3 and Winter 1, 2, 3, and 4 Ponds). There is a smaller pond known as the Winter Aeration Cell <br /> between the headworks and the Summer Aeration Cell, which is used during the winter when <br /> influent flows are lowest. <br /> 4. The treatment plant receives discharges from two major industrial dischargers: the Sun Garden- <br /> Gangi tomato cannery and the Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant(RBAAP) groundwater <br /> treatment system. The Discharger issues industrial discharge permits to these entities each year, <br /> which limit the flow rate, BOD mass loading rate, and concentrations of various other <br /> constituents, as applicable to the discharge. <br /> 5. The tomato cannery discharge is seasonal, occurring typically from July through September. The <br /> industrial discharge permit for the year 2000 did not limit the flow rate, and the flow ranged from <br /> 1.7 to 3.8 mgd. The maximum daily BOD loading was limited to 40,000 pounds per day as a daily <br /> maximum and 30,000 pounds per day as a 30-day average. The cannery discharge has frequently <br /> exceeded the BOD loading rate limits, resulting in major plant upsets that caused strong odors <br /> every year for the past several years. <br /> 6. The RBAAP groundwater treatment system was originally designed to remove nitrate, cyanide, <br /> and chromium. Prior to the year 2000, RBAAP discharged only ion exchange regeneration brine, <br /> which contributed significant salt but little flow to the Discharger's treatment plant. In 2000, with <br /> concurrence of Board staff, RBAAP ceased use of the ion exchange system, thereby reducing the <br /> salt load to the facility. Concurrently, RBAAP began discharging the treated groundwater to the <br /> Discharger's facility at a constant rate of 250,000 gpd, increasing the nitrate load. In early 2001, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.