My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010443
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STEINEGUL
>
15634
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0540821
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 10:17:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010443
RECORD_ID
PR0540821
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023401
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER GREER CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
15634
STREET_NAME
STEINEGUL
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
15634 STEINEGUL RD
P_LOCATION
06
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fl 1 <br /> ATC Associates Inc <br /> 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Surte B <br /> (: <br /> Modesto, Califorma 95351 VYAkTC <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> ASSOCIATE s INC Fax 209-579-2225 <br /> In June and July 2000, WHF supervised the advancement of ten soil bonngs at the site and <br /> completed five of the borings as groundwater monitoring wells MW5, MW6, MW8, MW9, and <br /> MW 10, and three of the borings as vapor extraction wells VE 1, VE2, and VE3 Groundwater <br /> monitoring well MW7 was replaced by vapor extraction well VE3 Soil samples collected from <br /> borings B101, B103, B104, VE3, and VE 1 contained detectable concentrations of TPHg and <br /> BTEX <br /> On August 16, 2003, the well casing elevations were re-surveyed by Condor Earth Technologies <br /> for elevation to within 0 01 foot under the supervision of a Califorma licensed land surveyor and <br /> presented in Table 3 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On November 19, 2004, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring <br /> wells NMI through MW6, MW8, MW9, and the on-site domestic well Well MW 10 has an <br /> obstruction at approximately 20 feet bgs and was not sampled The locations of the monitoring <br /> wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, <br /> electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured and turbidity was visually observed in <br /> groundwater purged from the monitoring wells and recorded A minimum of three well casing <br /> volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover and <br /> samples were collected from each well using dedicated disposable bailers <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to Argon Laboratories Inc <br /> (Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Certification No 2359), a California-certified <br /> analytical laboratory, for chemical analysis of TPHg and utilizing EPA Method 8015B, BTEX <br /> utilizing EPA Method 8021B, and MTBE, tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether <br /> (RIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA), and 1,2 dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing EPA Method 8260B Groundwater well <br /> purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1 <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements collected from wells MW 1 through MW6, MW8, and MW9 on <br /> November 19, 2004, ranged from 72 03 to 76 20 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations <br /> This represents an increase in groundwater table elevation by an average of 1 44 feet from the <br /> August 17, 2004, sampling event The data from MW6 was not used for contouring because it is <br /> screened in a deeper interval The water level data was used to develop the groundwater <br /> elevation contour map (Figure 3) Shallow groundwater flow in the uppermost aquifer varied <br /> across the site on August 17, 2004, but was generally toward the southeast The average <br /> hydraulic gradient was calculated to be 0 03 ft/ft or approximately 158 ft/mile A summary of <br /> groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> s\envwomentW\25291 Veports\4QR-2004 dm 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.