Laserfiche WebLink
r) <br /> ,.BafPP�•r <br /> 4 <br /> . A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> MW10, and three of the borings as vapor extraction wells VEI, VE2, and VE3 Groundwater <br /> monitoring well MW7 was replaced by vapor extraction well VE3 Soil samples collected from <br /> borings B101, B103, B104, VE3, and VE1 contained detectable concentrations of TPHg and <br /> BTEX <br /> On August 16, 2003, the well casing elevations were re-surveyed by Condor Earth Technologies <br /> for elevation to within 0 01 foot under the supervision of a California licensed land surveyor and <br /> presented in Table 3 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On August 17, 2004, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring <br /> wells MWI through MW6, MW8, MW9, and the on-site domestic well Well MW10 has an <br /> obstruction at approximately 20 feet bgs and was not sampled The locations of the monitoring <br /> wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, <br /> electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured and turbidity was visually observed in <br /> groundwater purged from the monitoring wells and recorded A minimum of three well casing <br /> volumes was purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover and <br /> samples were collected from each well using dedicated disposable bailers <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to Argon Laboratories Inc <br /> (Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Certification No 2359), a California-certified <br /> analytical laboratory, for chemical analysis of TPHg and total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel <br /> (TPHd) utilizing EPA method 801513, BTEX utilizing EPA method 802113, and MTBE, tertiary <br /> butyl alcohol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl <br /> methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2 dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing <br /> EPA method 8260B Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment I <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements collected from wells MWI through MW6, MW8, and MW9 on <br /> August 17, 2004, ranged from 73 02 to 77 98 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations <br /> This represents a decrease in groundwater table elevation by an average of 1 65 feet from the <br /> May 27, 2004, sampling event The data from MW6 was not used for contouring because it is <br /> screened in a deeper interval The water level data were used to develop the groundwater <br /> elevation contour map (Figure 3) Shallow groundwater flow in the uppermost aquifer varied <br /> across the site on August 17, 2004, but was generally toward the southeast The average <br /> hydraulic gradient was calculated to be 0 05 ft/ft or approximately 264 ft/mile A summary of <br /> groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> . The groundwater samples collected from wells MWI, MW2, MW4, MWS, MW6, and MW9 and <br /> contained detectable concentrations of TPHg and/or BTEX constituents The groundwater <br /> S IenvjromentaIQ52911reportsL3QR-2004 doe 2 <br />