Laserfiche WebLink
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> for selected target compounds rather than the full suite of site compounds Care must be taken to collect <br /> and analyze the samples consistently with the collection and analysis procedures used during prior phases <br /> Of the project to maximize comparability The SAP should include provisions for resampling should an <br /> unusual positive result be found during this stage The data should continue to be entered into the database <br /> if one had been implemented <br /> 9-9. Rebound <br /> As previously described,the rate of contaminant removal by soil venting is generally fast during early <br /> phases of operation and then becomes progressively slower until it approaches a relatively low value <br /> When a soil venting system is turned off and then on again,there is generally a spike in the rate of <br /> contaminant removal, as depicted in Figure 9-2 This phenomenon is usually described as rebound, that is <br /> the concentrations of the contaminants rebound toward their initial higher levels after soil venting has <br /> ceased for some period Rebound of vapor concentrations implies that rate-luruted mass transfer is <br /> occurring during soil venting For example, if air extraction rates exceed the rate of diffusive mass transfer <br /> from within the pore water to the air-water interface and then into the flowing air stream,contarmnant <br /> concentrations in the extracted air can dinvmsh without removing all of the contaminant from the pore <br /> water When extraction stops, the diffusion process continues and eventually the concentration(s)within <br /> the soil pores that are most conductive to air begin to rise If a soil gas sample is collected or extraction <br /> begins again,then the contaminant concentrations will have "rebounded" Rebound will be observed <br /> whenever air extraction occurs faster than the rate of contaminant diffusion from some sequestered <br /> location Contaminants can be considered sequestered if they reside outside of the air-filled pores that <br /> conduct the majority of the air that flows to the extraction well <br /> a What is the significance of rehound? At many sites,the objective of soil venting is to reduce soil <br /> contaminant concentrations to below a specific value Those portions of the subsurface that can readily be <br /> swept by air that flows due to soil venting may reach these target values However, if concentrations are <br /> observed to rebound,then there is most likely soil where contaminant concentrations have not been <br /> appreciably reduced to target clean-up levels Thus,even at sites where substantial contaminant mass is <br /> removed by soil venting, this"sequestered" contannnation can often cause the site to fail to meet cleanup <br /> objectives <br /> b How is rebound measured and assessed? Rebound in the simplest sense is observed when a <br /> system is shut down for a time, and then vapor phase concentrations are observed to rise in the treatment <br /> area Tlus phenomenon is observed at most sites,however,site specific conditions such as soil <br /> stratigraphy,moisture content,and historical pattern of contamination cause the rate at which contaminant <br /> concentrations rebound to vary dramatically from site to site There is rarely a systematic approach applied <br /> for measuring rebound or for evaluating the rate and extent of concentration rebound Instead,rebound <br /> tests are often used to qualitatively evaluate the progress of remediation, or sometimes quantitatively to <br /> compare the rebounded concentration at some designated time to a specified"standard" However,a <br /> properly executed rebound test can provide much greater insight into the status of remediation Appendix F <br /> provides a detailed approach for performing rebound tests and for interpreting the data collected before and <br /> during the test In addition,Appendix F provides the mathematical framework that is the basis of rebound <br /> data evaluation,as well as the basis for modeling SVEBV cleanup rates and predicting remediation <br /> endpoints and timeframes <br /> 9-10 <br />