Laserfiche WebLink
EM 1110-1-4001 <br /> 3 Jun 02 <br /> c Estimating the Impact ofDiuszon Limitations on Remediation Timeframes <br /> (1) By measuring rebound rates and using a simple analytical model (Brusseau 1996)some <br /> practitioners are able to estimate the impact of rate-limited mass transport on remediation timeframes <br /> Praxis Environmental Technologies,Inc developer of the PneulogTm tool,reports that mass transfer <br /> constraints,order-of-magnitude total mass,and time to cleanup can be estimated from historical <br /> concentration data and rebound test data Figure 9-2 shows data collected using a PneulogTM device to <br /> vertically profile extracted concentrations and flow rates in a single SVE well during a rebound test SVE <br /> was performed at this site for 12 days,then paused for four days,and then reinitiated at the same flow rates <br /> as before The data show the characteristic rebound in extracted vapor concentrations that is seen in most <br /> SVE systems At this site,the rebound in TCE concentration is presumably due to diffusion from a less <br /> permeable zone into the pathways that transmit most of the air to the extraction well After the pause,a <br /> rebound in the extracted vapor concentration of almost 10 percent was observed <br /> (2) Figure 9-2 also includes a plot of the results of Brusseau's model,with best-fit parameters,and <br /> displays a close match with the measured concentration decay and rebound The model has been developed <br /> in the academic literature(Brusseau 1996)but is used infrequently in field practice because the proper data <br /> are not collected or practitioners are not familiar with the model <br /> The basic simplifying assumptions in the model are <br /> soils are categorized as two-domain,i e,permeable to air flow(mobile)or not(immobile),and <br /> the early flushing rate of the mobile zone by clean air is rapid enough to justify averaging the <br /> contaminant concentration in the mobile zone <br /> (3) Typical SVE flow rates flush the mobile zone with clean air every few days justifying the <br /> averaging assumption Most sites readily meet the conceptual model of mobile and immobile zones for air <br /> movement during SVE A third category of low flow zones(e g,silts)can be added if sufficient site data <br /> exist Air moves through the mobile soils and contaminants must diffuse out of immobile zones before <br /> being extracted The form of the equation describing the vapor concentration in the mobile zone (assumed <br /> equal to the extracted concentration)is roughly <br /> Cmob,le is a function of (Contribution of Mobile Zone] + [Contribution of Immobile Zone] <br /> or <br /> Cmohde —✓ `Ole +O2e ) (9-1) <br /> where <br /> O, =an advective decay constant <br /> Oz =a diffusive decay constant <br /> r, =a function of air residence time within the soil pores <br /> r2 =a function of the compound's diffusivity in the rate-limiting soil type <br /> t= elapsed soil venting time <br /> 9-11 <br />