Laserfiche WebLink
Adequate recovery was observf d in the purged wells prior to sampling A disposable bailer was used <br /> to collect the groundwater samples All samples were decanted from the bailer Into the appropriate <br /> containers, preserved with Ice, and transported under chain-of-custody protocol to Advanced <br /> Technology Laboratory (ATL) in Signal Hill, California for the organic chemical analysis and to <br /> Severn Trent Laboratories in Pleasanton, California for the Inorganic chemical analysis <br /> tA total of six inches of free-floating product was observed in monitoring well MW-3 Due to the <br /> presence of free product no groundwater sample was collected from MW-3 <br /> The water samples were analyzed for TPHg following EPA Method 8015 and for BTEX and FOCs <br /> t following EPA Method 8260 Per the RWQCB written request, the water samples collected from <br /> wells MW-5, MW-5D, MW-6, and MW-9 were analyzed for dissolved metals following EPA <br /> Method 200 8 <br />' <br /> 33 Remediation System Operation and Maintenance and Performance Summar <br /> V q <br />' Operation and maintenance (O&M) of the remediation system is performed monthly (or as needed) <br /> Photo ionization detector (PID) readings from the SVE effluent and influent is performed weekly as <br /> required by the San Joaquin Unified Air Pollution Control District A brief description and <br /> performance evaluation of the remedial system between October 15, 2003 and January 9, 2004 is <br /> presented below <br /> 3 3 1 SVE System <br />' The SVE system is comprised of a skid-inounted 300-cfin blower with knockout pot manifolded to <br /> ten SVE wells (V-1 through V-10) with GAC used as the abatement device During the reporting <br /> period of October 15, 2003 through January 9, 2004, the SVE system was approximately 87% <br />' operational The system was down for seven days between October 28 and November 4, 2003 while <br /> waiting for carbon change out, down for two days between December 2 and December 4, 2003 while <br />' waiting for carbon change out, and down for two days between January 7 and January 9, 2004 as the <br /> transition period between the 300-cfm blower and the 300-cfm electric catalytic oxidizer (300- <br /> ECAT) The 300-ECAT system was non-operational during this reporting period <br />' The averse vacuum for the SVE system was 73 inches of water, and the average flow rate was 265 <br /> g Y g <br />' cfin The average SVE system influent TPHg concentration during the reporting period was 277 <br /> parts per million volume (ppmv) <br />' The SVE system removed approximately 111 pounds of TPHg, 1 4 pounds of benzene, and 0 pounds <br /> of MTBE during the ieporting period The SVE system operational and analytical data including <br />' hours of operation, applied vacuum, flow rate, field PID data, influent TPHg and benzene <br /> concentrations, and mass removal data are presented in Table 3 <br />' Project No 58643-06-01 -5- February 18,2004 <br />