My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008338
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 11:44:21 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:10:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008338
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 40 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> • Groundwater laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 1 In the Fourth Quarter 2003, <br /> approximately i/4-inch of free floating product was observed on the water surface in groundwater <br /> monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3, no groundwater samples were collected due to the presence of <br />' free product The highest benzene, TPHg, and MTBE concentrations were detected in MW-2 at 91 <br /> micrograms per liter (ug/1), 180 ug/l, and 12 ug/l, respectively MTBE was also present in <br /> groundwater monitoring wells MW-4, MW-5, and MW-7 at concentrations ranging from 0 51 ug/I <br /> (MW-7) to 6 9 ug/1 (MW-4) Other FOCs were not detected above the laboratory reporting limits in <br /> samples collected from the groundwater monitoring wells except MW-2 where TBA (180 ug/1) and <br /> ETRE (12 ug/1)were detected Well AS-1, located within the source area and screened from 40 to 45 <br /> feet below ground surface (bgs) (deeper than the monitoring wells), was sampled for the fifth time <br />' since the startup of remedial activities The groundwater sample collected from AS-1 did not contain <br /> concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, or FOCs above the laboratory reporting limits (Table 1) Copies of <br /> the laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody documents for the groundwater samples wells <br />' are Included in Appendix C <br /> A decreasing contaminant trend in groundwater has been observed since the start of remediation in <br /> the Third Quarter 2002 (September 2002)through the Fourth Quarter 2003 (October 2003) <br /> MThere were no established trends for the analytical data for dissolved metal concentrations from <br /> wells MW-5, MW-513, MW-6, and MW-9(Table 2) The collected data will be compared with future <br /> dissolved metal concentrations in order to monitor the effects of ozone on dissolved metals in <br /> groundwater at the site Copies of the laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody documents <br /> for the groundwater samples collected from the groundwater monitoring wells are included in <br /> Appendix C <br />' The water samples collected from domestic wells DW-2R and DW-3 did not contain detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg, BTEX or FOCs DW-1, sampled monthly, did not contain detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, oxygenates, 1,2-DCA, or EDB Copies of the laboratory analytical <br /> reports and chain-of-custody documents for the water samples collected from the domestic wells are <br /> included in Appendix C <br /> Prol(a No 58643-06-01 -8- N0VL1nbLr 3 2003 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.