My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008338
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 11:44:21 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:10:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008338
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> MTBE removal data is presented in Table 4 A summary of the emissions data is presented in Table <br /> 5 SVE well data, including open/closed status, vacuum, flow, and PID data are presented in Table 6 <br /> Graphical presentation of TPHg and benzene mass removal and influent concentration data are <br />' shown on Figures 6 and 7, respectively Copies of the O&M field notes are included in Appendix A <br /> Influent and effluent vapor sample laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B <br /> As shown in Figure 6, the SVE system influent contaminant concentrations demonstrated a sharp <br /> increase in concentrations coincident to the startup of the 300-sefm SVE skid on June 26, 2003 The <br />' 300-scfin SVE skid pulls higher vacuums and greater flow rates than the previous 500 scfin SVE <br /> skid with thermal oxidizer The increased vacuum and flow resulted in an initial increase in influent <br /> contaminant concentrations After July 23, 2003 the vapor influent concentrations sharply decreased <br /> from 790 ppmv and leveled off to an average of 266 ppmv in September through October 2003 The <br /> mass removal trend (Figure 7)demonstrates that mass removal is on a steady low angle incline <br /> 33.2 Ozone Sparge System <br />' A skid-mounted ozone sparge system, enclosed in a shed within the remediation compound, can <br /> inject ozone into groundwater through 19 available ozone sparge wells (S-1 through S-19) located <br /> on- and offsite Sparge well S-20 was not connected to the sparge system manifold and is not used <br /> tAn ozone meter attached to the ozone sparge system skid will shut down the remediation system if <br /> ozone is detected at levels greater than 0 01 ppm within the shed The ozone injection manifold is set <br /> up to inject ozone for 10 minutes at a time into the sparge wells It can cycle through 10 wells at <br /> 100% the maximum injection rate (one well at a time), or all 20 wells (two wells at a time) at 50% <br /> the maximum injection rate Approximately 2 5 pounds of ozone can be injected into the subsurface <br />' each day at optimum ozone production Ozone production is variable dependent on atmospheric <br /> temperatures The ozone sparge system is designed to deliver at an approximate rate of 6 liters per <br /> t1linUte <br /> On May 27, 2003, it was observed that there was no flow registering on the ozone generator flow <br />' meter Motsture was observed in the ozone line leading from the ozone generator to the manifold It <br /> was also observed that the pressure relief valve in the oxygen condenser was relieving frequently <br />' Geocon consulted with ARCE Systems, Inc , the ozone system skid assembler, to correct the system <br /> ARCE indicated that the ozone generator would need maintenance that could only be performed at <br /> their shop and the oxygen condenser would have to be re-packed by the manufacturer On May 30, <br /> 2003, the ozone generator and oxygen condenser were removed and transported to ARCE in <br /> Massachusetts The re-furbished ozone generator was returned in August 2003 and was re-installed <br />' on August 6, 2003 However, the ozone sparge system could not be operated without the oxygen <br /> condenser ARCE indicated that the manufacturer of the oxygen condenser had not re-packed the <br /> condenser at that point in time Due to the delays in the return of the oxygen condenser and the lack <br />' of confidence in that manufacturer's product, ARCE and Geocon concluded that ARCE's new re- <br /> engineered oxygen condenser unit would be necessary for the ozone sparge system <br /> Pi ILU No S8643-06-o t -6- N0VC111bCr 3,2003 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.