My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008375
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SANTA FE
>
23569
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541936
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008375
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 11:38:30 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 11:26:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008375
RECORD_ID
PR0541936
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0006149
FACILITY_NAME
RANCH MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
23569
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SANTA FE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
RIVERBANK
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
23569 S SANTA FE RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I SECOR <br /> 111h,;nallonal h1col/x0lale(/ <br /> December 18, 2000 <br /> Mr Marty Hartzell <br /> California RWQCB Central Valley Region <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br /> Subject: Addendum To The Problem Assessment Report <br /> Ranch Market <br /> 23569 Santa Fe Road <br /> Riverbank, California <br /> SECOR Project No. 077.42098.004 <br /> Dear Mr Hartzell <br /> Per your request, SECOR International Incorporated (SECOR) submits an addendum to <br /> SECOR's Problem Assessment Report (PAR) dated November 8, 2000 for the Ranch Market <br /> Site (Attachment 1, Figures 1 and 2) This letter includes a remediation feasibility matrix <br /> presenting cost estimates for five soil and groundwater remedial options for the subject site <br /> (Attachment 2, Table 1) <br /> The following technologies and associated cost to remediate petroleum hydrocarbons adsorbed <br /> to soil and dissolved in groundwater at the Site were evaluated <br /> • Soil Excavation, <br /> • Passive Biodegradation with long term groundwater monitoring, <br /> • In-situ Biologic and/or Chemical Treatment, <br /> • Soil Vapor Extraction combined with Air Sparging (SVE/AS), <br /> • Soil Vapor Extraction combined with Ozone Sparging (SVE/OS) <br /> • Soil SVE/AS combined with Groundwater Extraction and Treatment (GET), <br /> Due to the depth to water and high formation permeability, cost estimates for Dual Phase <br /> Extraction and Water Treatment (DPET) were not prepared <br /> Based upon the distribution of gasoline in the soil and groundwater, the lithology, and depth to <br /> groundwater, SECOR eliminated most of the considered alternatives <br /> Option 1 Soil Excavation <br /> Removal of the impacted soil by excavation was eliminated due to the impracticality of <br /> excavating to depths in excess of the 30 feet In addition, soil excavation will not remove or <br /> degrade the gasoline dissolved in groundwater Costs estimates to excavate an area 30 feet by 40 <br /> File Ranch Markets PAR Cost Est 1 doc <br /> 301- hrl"u)it, harm SlyIh 100 Rancho (r,rcloru ( 1 956-0 ()1�, tial uaUU 'll(r 5G1 0fy) I(I% llrrrr tcor trOP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.