Laserfiche WebLink
Addendum To The Problem Assessment Report 2 <br /> Ranch Market 23564 Santa Fe Road Riverbank California DeCLmher 18 2000 <br /> feet and 30 feet deep have been prepared and are presented in Table 1, Option I SECOR does <br /> not recommend this remedial approach <br /> Option 2 Passive Biodegradation <br /> Passive biodegradation does not address migration of dissolved MtBE or the gasoline adsorbed <br /> to soil in the vadose zone The cost estimate presented in Table I assumes 20 years of quarterly <br /> groundwater monitonng and sampling SECOR does not recommend this remedial approach <br /> Option 3 In-situ Biologic and/or Chemical Treatment <br /> In-situ bioremediation or chemical treatment was eliminated because it would not be effective in <br /> the destruction of hydrocarbons in the vadose zone In-situ destruction of hydrocarbons in the <br /> groundwater may be used to supplement operation of the SVE/AS system Methods of in-situ <br /> treatment include 1) Injection of nutrients and cultured bacteria to stimulate biologic activity, <br /> and 2) Injection of chemical oxidizers such as peroxide or ozone to directly destroy <br /> hydrocarbons and to stimulate biologic activity by increasing the dissolved oxygen <br /> concentrations The cost estimate assumes a total of 10 injection events will be performed and a <br /> total of 15 years of groundwater monitoring and sampling will be needed before closure is <br /> granted Since this option does not address vadoes contamination, SECOR does not recommend <br /> this remedial approach <br /> Option 4 Soil Vapor Extraction combined with Air Sparging <br /> Based on results of the SVE test, operation of a SVE system will effectively remove the gasoline <br /> . adsorbed to soil within the vadose zone Operation of the air sparging may strip dissolved <br /> gasoline from the groundwater The air sparging will also increase the dissolved oxygen <br /> concentration in the groundwater and stimulate the in-situ destruction of gasoline by aerobic <br /> bacterial activity <br /> Based on the fourth quarter groundwater monitoring and sampling data, it appears the air <br /> sparging may have resulted in lateral transport of dissolved gasoline range hydrocarbons to the <br /> perimeter wells (Attachment 1, Table 2) Given the groundwater sample data, initial air sparging <br /> rates must be very low to avoid the lateral transport of dissolved gasoline range hydrocarbons <br /> The costs associated with installation and operation of an SVE/AS system for 3 years has been <br /> included in Table 1 Using an SVE radius of influence of 40 feet, a total of 10 soil vapor <br /> extraction wells are proposed to remove the hydrocarbons from the vadose zone and to capture <br /> the air injected into the air sparging wells Assuming a 30-foot radius of influence for the air <br /> sparging wells, a total of 7 air sparge wells are proposed to either remove or stimulate in-situ <br /> biologic destruction of the petroleum hydrocarbons in the saturated zone The assumed 3 year <br /> run time is conservative and may actually be less than two years <br /> Due to the apparent lateral transport of dissolved gasoline compounds during the air sparge test, <br /> SECOR does not recommend using aggressive air sparging combined with SVE at the site <br /> Option 5 Soil Vapor Extraction combined with Ozone Sparging <br /> Based on results of the SVE test, operation of a SVE system will effectively remove the gasoline <br /> adsorbed to soil within the vadose zone The ozone sparging will chemically destroy the <br /> File Ranch Market)PAR-Cost Est i doc <br />