My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012626
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
145
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543041
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 3:03:14 PM
Creation date
5/18/2020 2:45:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012626
RECORD_ID
PR0543041
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024604
FACILITY_NAME
HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
STREET_NUMBER
145
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
14912016
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
145 S SUTTER ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3.1.2 yublicHealth and Environmental Analysis <br /> The purpose of remedial action at a site is to rectify any <br /> existing and potential future public health and environmental <br /> effects due to compounds present at the site. Therefore, the <br /> ability of a remedial alternative to mitigate or eliminate these <br /> impacts is important. Remedial alternatives will be evaluated by <br /> considering their ability to: <br /> o Abate or minimize migration of existing or potentially <br /> impacted groundwater. <br /> o Abate or minimize existing and potential migration of <br /> compounds to air, soils, sediments, surface water, and <br /> groundwater. <br /> a Minimize any potential adverse impacts on human health, <br /> wildlife and vegetation, neighboring properties, and other <br /> sensitive populations. <br /> o Minimize any potential additional impacts to air, land, <br /> surface water, and groundwater during remedial action <br /> operations. <br /> o Prevent human access or possible physical contact with <br /> materials of concern during field activities and after site <br /> i � work is completed. <br /> 3.1.3 Institutional Analysis <br /> i <br /> The institutional factors that will be considered in the evalua- <br /> tion of remedial action alternatives include: <br /> o Acceptability by local and state regulatory agencies. <br /> o Safety of both on and off--site activities during implementa- <br /> tion of the alternatives. <br /> N. o Public perception. <br /> "- o Permits and licenses (e.g. , air or water discharge permits; <br /> construction or operations permits) . <br /> o Long-term land use. <br /> o Long-term management requirements. <br /> - 3.1.4 Cost Analysis - <br /> A remedial cleanup program must not only be technically feasible <br /> »» for addressing the environmental objectives of the remedial <br /> action, but also must be amenable to implementation in a <br /> ��. 3 - 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.